The Oppo A98 and Honor X9a are both compelling contenders in the budget 5G smartphone market. Both offer a Snapdragon 695 chipset and aim to deliver a smooth experience without breaking the bank. But which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging, which provides a 50% charge in just 18 minutes. While both phones share the same processor, the Oppo's charging advantage and potentially better software support make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 19 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min | 40W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black |
| Models | CPH2529 | RMO-NX1 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | $ 212.08 |
Oppo A98
- Faster 67W Charging
- Potentially better software optimization (ColorOS)
- Sleek Design
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Honor X9a
- Stylish curved display
- Potentially more affordable
- Decent performance with Snapdragon 695
- Slower 40W charging
- Software experience may vary
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature a 6.6-inch or similar display with a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. The Honor X9a is known for its curved display, which some users find aesthetically pleasing, while the Oppo A98 may opt for a flatter display, potentially offering better screen protection and usability. We'll need to confirm specific panel types (AMOLED vs LCD) for a more accurate comparison.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera specs are needed, both phones likely feature a primary 64MP camera. Image quality will depend on sensor size, image processing algorithms, and software features. We'll need to analyze sample photos to determine which phone produces better results in various lighting conditions.
Performance
Sharing the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration, both phones should offer similar performance in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, software optimization can play a crucial role. Oppo's ColorOS and Honor's Magic UI have different approaches, which could impact the perceived smoothness and responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Honor X9a likely has a 5000mAh battery, while the Oppo A98's battery capacity is also likely around 5000mAh. However, the Oppo A98's 67W charging significantly outperforms the Honor X9a's 40W charging, resulting in much faster charging times.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A98 is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and potentially a more polished software experience. The Honor X9a is a good option for those seeking a stylish design and a slightly more affordable price point, but are willing to compromise on charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have similar battery capacities, the Oppo A98's faster charging means it will recharge much quicker, effectively giving you more usable battery time throughout the day.
❓ Are these phones good for gaming?
Both phones are capable of handling casual and moderate gaming thanks to the Snapdragon 695 chipset. However, demanding games may require lower graphics settings for smooth performance.
