The Oppo A96 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core processing power and charging capabilities, making the choice dependent on user priorities. This comparison dissects these differences to reveal which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and future-proofing with 5G connectivity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a performance edge, despite both phones utilizing a 6nm process.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 16 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunset Blue | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | CPH2333 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo A96
- Potentially longer battery life due to 4G connectivity and slightly less powerful chipset.
- More conservative power consumption.
- Likely a more affordable price point.
- Lacks 5G connectivity, limiting future-proofing.
- Slower charging speeds (33W vs 67W).
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Significantly faster 67W charging.
- 5G connectivity for future network compatibility.
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset for smoother performance.
- Potentially shorter battery life due to 5G and more powerful chipset.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Faster charging can generate more heat during charging.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize AMOLED panels. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, being a 'Pro' model, may feature a higher peak brightness and potentially a 120Hz refresh rate, offering a smoother visual experience. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is likely to feature a more advanced camera system, potentially including a higher-resolution main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The A96 likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G aims for a more premium imaging experience. The presence of OIS on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G would be a significant advantage in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A96 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) boasts the Snapdragon 695 5G. Both are built on a 6nm process, indicating similar efficiency. However, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a slight advantage over the A96’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores. The 695 also includes an integrated 5G modem, a key differentiator. While the A96’s CPU clock speed is higher, the architectural improvements in the 695, coupled with its 5G capabilities, translate to a more responsive experience, particularly in network-intensive tasks. The A96's 4G limitation will be a significant drawback for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
Both devices likely feature batteries in the 4500-5000 mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer, achieving a 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes (advertised). The Oppo A96’s 33W charging, while respectable, takes 26 minutes to reach 50% and significantly longer for a full charge. This difference in charging speed directly impacts usability, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience. The Snapdragon 695's efficiency may also contribute to slightly better battery life in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A96 if you prioritize a slightly more conservative power profile and are content with 4G connectivity, potentially extending battery life between charges. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value faster charging speeds, 5G support for future network compatibility, and a modest performance boost for multitasking and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. While not a flagship chipset, it offers a noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 680, particularly in sustained performance due to its more efficient architecture.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the Oppo A96's 33W charging in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is significantly faster. While the Oppo A96 takes over 26 minutes to reach 50%, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G achieves this in just 15 minutes. A full charge on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G takes approximately 42 minutes, compared to a considerably longer time on the Oppo A96. This translates to less time tethered to a charger.
❓ Does the lack of 5G on the Oppo A96 impact its overall usability in 2024?
The absence of 5G on the Oppo A96 is a growing limitation. While 4G remains widely available, 5G networks are expanding rapidly. Users in areas with 5G coverage will experience significantly faster download and upload speeds with the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, impacting streaming, gaming, and general internet browsing.
