The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and Oppo A96 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches. The Poco X4 Pro 5G prioritizes 5G connectivity and faster charging, while the Oppo A96 focuses on a streamlined experience with a power-efficient processor. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift and future-proofs connectivity, while the significantly faster 67W charging mitigates the impact of a similar battery capacity to the Oppo A96. However, users prioritizing maximum battery efficiency may find the Oppo A96 appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 16 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunset Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CPH2333 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A96
- Power-efficient Snapdragon 680 processor
- Reliable all-day battery life
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slower 33W charging speed
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proof networking
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 processor
- Potentially slightly lower battery efficiency due to 5G and more powerful processor
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price points, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery conservation rather than visual fluidity. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific sensor details are absent. Without knowing megapixel counts or sensor sizes, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on software processing to enhance image quality. The absence of any mention of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) indicates that both phones will likely struggle in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and fixed focus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a higher clock speed for its prime core (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the A96’s Snapdragon 680). While the A96 has a slightly higher clock speed on its 'Gold' cores, the 695’s Kryo 660 cores are generally more efficient. The 6nm process node on both chips contributes to improved power efficiency compared to older generations. The 5G modem in the Poco X4 Pro 5G is a key differentiator, offering future-proof connectivity. The A96 is limited to 4G. The Poco X4 Pro 5G will likely handle multitasking and moderately demanding games with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery performance despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging can reach 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, a significant advantage over the Oppo A96’s 33W charging, which takes 26 minutes to reach 50%. This faster charging capability effectively mitigates any potential battery life differences, allowing Poco X4 Pro 5G users to quickly top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A96 if you prioritize all-day battery life and a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light communication. Its Snapdragon 680 is optimized for efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want 5G connectivity, faster charging speeds, and a more capable processor for occasional gaming or demanding applications. The 67W charging is a significant advantage for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 695 is a relatively efficient chip. While it will generate heat during prolonged gaming, the 6nm process node and Xiaomi’s thermal management system should prevent significant throttling. Expect playable frame rates, but not necessarily sustained peak performance during demanding titles.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo A96 slow compared to other phones in this price range?
Yes, 33W charging is noticeably slower than the 67W charging found on the Poco X4 Pro 5G and many other recent budget phones. While it's not unusable, it will take considerably longer to fully charge the device, potentially requiring overnight charging.
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in performance between the Snapdragon 680 and 695 for everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference will be minimal. However, the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G will provide a smoother experience when multitasking or running more demanding applications.
❓ Does the Poco X4 Pro 5G support all 5G bands in the US?
5G band support varies by carrier and region. It's crucial to check the Poco X4 Pro 5G's specifications and compatibility with your specific carrier before purchasing to ensure it supports the 5G bands used in your area.
