Realme 9 Pro+ vs Oppo A96: A Detailed Comparison for the Budget-Conscious
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset delivers significantly faster performance than the Oppo A96’s Snapdragon 680, and the 60W charging drastically reduces downtime. While the A96 offers respectable battery life, the 9 Pro+'s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A96 | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 16 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min Reverse wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunset Blue | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | CPH2333 | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A96
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to Snapdragon 680
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Reverse wired charging for accessory power
- Significantly slower performance compared to the 9 Pro+
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely inferior display quality
Realme 9 Pro+
- Much faster performance with the Dimensity 920
- 60W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Superior display technology (likely AMOLED)
- Potentially slightly lower battery life due to higher performance
- May be more expensive than the Oppo A96
- Dimensity 920 may run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The context data lacks display specifics for the Oppo A96, but given its market positioning, we can assume a standard 60Hz LCD panel. The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, which is a marketing term for a typical AMOLED panel. AMOLED inherently provides deeper blacks and more vibrant colors than LCDs. While both are built on 6nm process technology, the Realme’s display technology offers a superior viewing experience. The lack of high refresh rate information on the A96 suggests it won't match the smoothness potentially offered by the 9 Pro+.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 9 Pro+ likely benefits from the processing power of the Dimensity 920, enabling more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The A96’s Snapdragon 680, while capable, will have less headroom for complex computational photography. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the 9 Pro+ would be a significant advantage, but this is unconfirmed. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the 9 Pro+ is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 920, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Oppo A96’s Snapdragon 680. The Dimensity 920’s Cortex-A78 cores are architecturally more advanced than the Snapdragon 680’s Kryo 265 Gold cores, resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 920 is designed for higher sustained performance. The Snapdragon 680 prioritizes efficiency, making the A96 suitable for less demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+’s 60W charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 44 minutes (advertised). The Oppo A96’s 33W charging, while respectable, takes considerably longer, reaching 50% in 26 minutes. The Realme 9 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting excellent battery optimization. While the A96’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the 9 Pro+ mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The 9 Pro+’s charging speed is a significant convenience factor for users who are constantly on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A96 if you prioritize long-lasting battery life and a consistently smooth, albeit less powerful, experience for everyday tasks like browsing and social media. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you value faster performance for gaming and demanding applications, and appreciate the convenience of significantly quicker charging speeds. The 9 Pro+ is the better option for power users.