Oppo A96 vs Oppo A98: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 emerges as the clear winner, thanks to its significantly faster charging, 5G connectivity, and slightly improved performance. However, the A96 remains a solid choice for those prioritizing 4G and a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A96 | Oppo A98 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 16 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunset Blue | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue |
| Models | CPH2333 | CPH2529 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 290 EUR |
Oppo A96
- Affordable
- Reliable 4G connectivity
- Decent camera for the price
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- No 5G support
- 60Hz display
Oppo A98
- Faster 67W charging
- 5G connectivity
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially higher refresh rate display
- Improved image processing
- Slightly more expensive
- May have slightly less RAM/storage in some configurations
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.56-inch display, likely with an FHD+ resolution. However, the A98 may have a slightly higher refresh rate (potentially 120Hz) compared to the A96 (likely 60Hz), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. Color accuracy and brightness are likely comparable, though the A98 might offer marginally better outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup with a primary sensor around 64MP. The A98 may have a slightly improved image processing pipeline and potentially better low-light performance due to its newer chipset. Video recording capabilities are likely similar, with both supporting 1080p recording.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the A98 offers a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 680 4G in the A96. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A98. While both handle everyday tasks well, the A98's chipset provides more headroom for demanding applications.
Battery Life
The A98's 67W fast charging is a significant advantage over the A96's 33W charging. It can charge the battery much faster, reducing downtime. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so real-world battery life should be comparable, but the A98 offers quicker replenishment.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A96 is ideal for users who primarily need a reliable 4G smartphone for everyday tasks, social media, and basic photography, and are budget-conscious. The Oppo A98 is better suited for those who want faster charging, 5G connectivity, and a smoother overall experience, even if it means spending a bit more.