Oppo's A-series consistently delivers impressive value in the budget smartphone market. The A96 and A95 are two strong contenders, offering a blend of features and affordability. But which one is the better choice for your needs? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A96 edges out the A95 thanks to its more efficient chipset (Snapdragon 680 vs 662), resulting in slightly better performance and potentially improved battery life. Both offer solid features for the price, but the A96 represents a worthwhile upgrade.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 16 | 2021, November 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2021, November 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunset Blue | Glowing Starry Black, Glowing Rainbow Silver |
| Models | CPH2333 | CHP2365, CPH2365 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 230 EUR |
Oppo A96
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Slightly better performance
- Potentially improved battery life
- Modern design
Oppo A95
- More affordable
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Large 5000mAh battery
- Good value for money
- Less efficient chipset
- Slightly older design
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch FHD+ display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth visual experience. The A96 might have slightly improved color accuracy due to its newer panel, but the difference is likely minimal for everyday use. Both displays are bright and vibrant enough for comfortable viewing.
Camera Comparison
The A96 typically features a 50MP main camera, while the A95 has a 48MP main camera. Both phones offer a similar camera setup with ultrawide and macro lenses. Image quality is generally good in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance is average on both devices. The A96's newer image processing algorithms might offer slightly better results.
Performance
The Snapdragon 680 in the A96 is built on a more efficient 6nm process compared to the A95's 11nm Snapdragon 662. This translates to better performance and potentially improved power efficiency. While both handle everyday tasks well, the A96 will likely feel snappier when multitasking or running more demanding apps. Gaming performance will also be slightly better on the A96.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. The A96's more efficient chipset gives it a slight edge in battery endurance. Both support 33W fast charging, with the A96 charging to 50% in approximately 26 minutes, while the A95 takes around 30 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A96 is ideal for users who prioritize smoother performance, slightly better battery efficiency, and a more modern design. The Oppo A95 remains a great option for those on a tighter budget who still want a reliable and feature-rich smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A96 worth the extra money compared to the A95?
If you prioritize performance and battery efficiency, the A96 is a worthwhile upgrade. However, if you're on a strict budget, the A95 still offers excellent value.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Oppo A96, thanks to its more powerful Snapdragon 680 chipset, will offer slightly better gaming performance.