Oppo A96 vs Oppo A78: A Head-to-Head Budget Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A78 edges out the A96 thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset, offering noticeably better performance for everyday tasks and gaming. While the A96 has a slightly better charging speed, the A78's overall performance and efficiency make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A96 | Oppo A78 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | IP54 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 16 | 2023, January 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2023, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunset Blue | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple |
| Models | CPH2333 | CPH2483, CPH2495 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 |
Oppo A96
- Faster charging (33W)
- Slightly more premium design (subjective)
- Good display quality
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially lower camera quality
- Can feel sluggish with heavy use
Oppo A78
- More powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
- Better performance for multitasking and gaming
- Slightly better battery efficiency
- Generally good value
- Slightly slower charging (33W)
- Design may be less premium (subjective)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.56-inch FHD+ display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth visual experience. The A96 might have slightly better color accuracy based on general Oppo A-series trends, but both are adequate for media consumption. The A78's display is generally well-regarded for its brightness and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The A96 typically features a 48MP main camera, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth sensor. The A78 usually has a 50MP main camera, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, the A78's slightly higher resolution and potentially improved image processing algorithms could result in slightly better image quality, especially in low light. Both phones offer decent front-facing cameras for selfies.
Performance
The Oppo A78's Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset (7nm) provides a significant performance advantage over the A96's Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The Dimensity 700's Cortex-A76 cores offer better CPU performance, resulting in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming capabilities. The A96 is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life. The A78's more efficient Dimensity 700 chipset gives it a slight edge in battery endurance. The A96 charges slightly faster (50% in 26 min vs 52% in 30 min), but the A78's overall efficiency compensates for this.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A96 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more premium design. The Oppo A78 is a better fit for those who value smoother performance, especially for multitasking and gaming, and appreciate a more efficient processor.