Both the Oppo A96 (China) and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) target the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market, powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 chipset. However, a critical divergence lies in their charging capabilities, with Xiaomi opting for significantly faster 67W charging compared to Oppo’s 33W solution. This comparison dissects these differences and other key specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and minimizing downtime, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the clear winner. Its 67W charging, capable of reaching 50% in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes (advertised), dramatically outperforms the Oppo A96’s 33W charging, which takes 63 minutes for a full charge. While both phones share the same core performance, the charging speed advantage tips the scales in Xiaomi’s favor.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 12 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 12 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | PFUM10 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo A96 (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- PD charging support
- Slower 33W charging
- Likely less advanced camera system
- Display details unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- PD3.0 and QC3 charging support
- Potentially better camera system
- Potentially higher price point
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (same as Oppo)
- Display details unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices are not specified with display details in the provided data. However, given their market positioning, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels. The absence of LTPO technology suggests standard refresh rates, likely 60Hz or 90Hz. Display quality will likely be a differentiating factor, with Xiaomi historically offering slightly more vibrant panels in this segment. Bezels are expected to be similar, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications. However, given the Redmi Note series’ history, the Pro+ model likely features a higher resolution main sensor and potentially OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) compared to the Oppo A96. While both phones likely include multiple rear cameras, the quality of the secondary sensors (ultrawide, macro) is often limited in this price range. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role, with Xiaomi typically favoring more saturated and vibrant images, while Oppo often aims for a more natural look.
Performance
Both the Oppo A96 and the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G are equipped with the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The real-world performance difference will hinge on RAM management and thermal throttling, areas not specified in the provided data. However, the 6nm process node ensures reasonable efficiency, minimizing heat generation during sustained tasks. Gaming performance will be similar, capable of handling most popular titles at medium settings.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the key differentiator is charging speed. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G boasts 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support, promising a 50% charge in 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes (advertised). In contrast, the Oppo A96 offers 33W wired charging with PD, taking 63 minutes to reach 100%. This 21-minute difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A96 (China) if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for users who don’t heavily rely on their phone throughout the day and can charge overnight. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value rapid charging, minimizing downtime, and appreciate the convenience of quickly topping up your battery, even during short breaks. This is ideal for power users and those frequently on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in either phone struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable mid-range chipset, but demanding titles like Genshin Impact will require reduced graphics settings and may still experience occasional frame drops. Both phones will offer a similar gaming experience, prioritizing smooth gameplay over ultra-high visual fidelity.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ compatible with all USB-C chargers?
While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G supports USB-PD and QC3, to achieve the full 67W charging speed, you'll need a charger that specifically supports these protocols. Using a standard USB-C charger will still charge the phone, but at a slower rate.
❓ Will the Oppo A96's 33W charging be sufficient for overnight charging?
Yes, 33W charging is perfectly adequate for overnight charging. It will fully charge the phone while you sleep, even if the battery is completely depleted. However, it won't provide the quick top-ups that the Redmi Note 11 Pro+'s 67W charging offers.
