Oppo A96 vs Xiaomi 11T Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 11T Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Snapdragon 888 chipset, a brighter display, and incredibly fast 120W charging. While the Oppo A96 is a decent budget option, the 11T Pro delivers a premium experience for a reasonable price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A96 (China) | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 12 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 12 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | PFUM10 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
Oppo A96 (China)
- Stylish design
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging
- Good value for money
- Slower charging
- Less powerful processor
- Lower display brightness
- Mediocre camera performance compared to 11T Pro
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Flagship-level performance
- Incredibly fast charging (120W)
- Bright and vibrant AMOLED display
- Excellent camera quality
- Smooth 120Hz refresh rate
- Higher price point
- Can get warm under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 11T Pro's 6.67-inch AMOLED display shines with a peak brightness of 837 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, offering vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Oppo A96 has a 6.43-inch AMOLED display, but its brightness is considerably lower, resulting in a less immersive viewing experience. The 120Hz refresh rate on the 11T Pro also provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups. The Xiaomi 11T Pro generally captures better photos and videos, especially in low light, thanks to its more advanced image processing and hardware. While the Oppo A96's camera is decent, it lacks the dynamic range and detail of the 11T Pro.
Performance
The Xiaomi 11T Pro's Snapdragon 888 is a powerhouse, easily handling demanding games and multitasking. The Oppo A96's Snapdragon 695 is capable for everyday use, but struggles with more intensive tasks. The 11T Pro's superior processing power is a significant advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 4500mAh battery. However, the Xiaomi 11T Pro's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 72% in just 10 minutes and 100% in 17 minutes. The Oppo A96's 33W charging is significantly slower.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A96 is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a stylish design and reliable performance for everyday tasks. The Xiaomi 11T Pro is perfect for those seeking a powerful phone with a great camera, fast charging, and a vibrant display, willing to spend a bit more.