The Oppo A96 (China) and vivo S10e represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a balance of performance, features, and affordability, but they take different approaches under the hood. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially more sustained performance, the vivo S10e emerges as the winner. Its 44W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Dimensity 900 offers a slight edge in CPU performance. However, the Oppo A96's Snapdragon 695 provides a solid 5G experience at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 12 | 2021, October 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 12 | Available. Released 2021, October 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, HDR |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 44W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Black, White, Aurora |
| Models | PFUM10 | V2130A |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 320 EUR |
Oppo A96 (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Qualcomm’s optimized 5G modem
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower 33W charging
- Slightly less powerful CPU compared to Dimensity 900
vivo S10e
- Faster 44W charging
- More powerful CPU for multitasking
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Likely a higher price tag
- May not have reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor vivo provide display specifications beyond the basic existence of a screen. Given the market segment, we can assume both utilize LCD panels. The lack of information prevents a detailed comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or refresh rates. However, the focus here is on internal components, making the display a less critical differentiating factor.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. We can assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup, likely including a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Image processing will likely differ, with Oppo traditionally favoring vibrant colors and vivo leaning towards more natural tones. The absence of information makes it difficult to assess real-world image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A96 (China) features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the vivo S10e boasts the MediaTek Dimensity 900 (6nm). The Dimensity 900’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a clock speed advantage over the Snapdragon 695’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. This translates to snappier application launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 900 generally exhibits better multi-core performance. The Snapdragon 695, however, benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized 5G modem, potentially offering more stable connectivity. Both likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, as is common in this price bracket.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the charging speeds are a clear differentiator. The Oppo A96 (China) supports 33W wired charging, reaching 100% in 63 minutes, while the vivo S10e offers significantly faster 44W wired charging. This faster charging is a substantial benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The difference in charging speed is more impactful than a potentially minor difference in battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A96 (China) if you need a reliable 5G connection and prioritize a potentially lower purchase price, accepting a slower charging speed. Buy the vivo S10e if you prefer faster 44W charging, a slightly more powerful CPU for multitasking, and are willing to spend a bit more for the convenience and performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 900 in the vivo S10e get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 695?
While both chips are 6nm, the Dimensity 900's higher clock speeds and performance can lead to more heat generation under sustained load. However, vivo's thermal management implementation will play a crucial role. Without specific thermal testing data, it's difficult to definitively say which phone will run cooler, but the Snapdragon 695 is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo A96 (China) slow enough to be a significant inconvenience in daily use?
33W charging is adequate, but the vivo S10e’s 44W charging offers a substantial time saving. The Oppo A96 takes 63 minutes for a full charge, while the S10e will likely be significantly faster. If you frequently need to quickly top up your phone, the S10e’s faster charging is a clear advantage.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, should I assume the camera performance is similar between the two phones?
Not necessarily. While the specs are missing, Oppo and vivo have different image processing philosophies. Oppo typically boosts colors for a more vibrant look, while vivo aims for more natural tones. Without sample photos, it's hard to say which approach you'll prefer, but expect a difference in image style.
