Both the Realme Q5 Pro and Oppo A96 (China) target the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market, but they take drastically different approaches to performance. The Q5 Pro leverages the proven Snapdragon 870, while the A96 opts for the more power-efficient Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects these choices, revealing which phone delivers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Realme Q5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 provides a substantial leap in processing power compared to the Oppo A96’s Snapdragon 695. However, the A96 offers a more balanced approach for everyday tasks and potentially better battery life, making it suitable for less demanding users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 12 | 2022, April 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 12 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Black, White, Yellow |
| Models | PFUM10 | RMX3372 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Oppo A96 (China)
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially longer battery life
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Q5 Pro
- Slower 33W charging
- Likely less capable camera system
Realme Q5 Pro
- Much faster Snapdragon 870 processor
- Incredibly fast 80W charging
- Superior gaming performance
- Potentially shorter battery life
- May run warmer under heavy load
- Likely higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Q5 Pro’s focus on performance, it’s reasonable to expect a higher refresh rate panel (likely 120Hz) compared to the A96. The Q5 Pro likely targets a brighter panel to complement its gaming focus. Color accuracy will likely be similar, leaning towards vibrant, consumer-friendly profiles typical of both brands.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the Q5 Pro’s positioning suggests a more capable camera system. The Snapdragon 870’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced than the 695’s, enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. We can expect the Q5 Pro to feature a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), features less likely to be found on the A96. The A96 will likely rely more on software enhancements to compensate for a less powerful ISP.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Q5 Pro’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo A96’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the 695’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold core. This translates to roughly a 40-50% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks and a substantial boost in GPU performance. The 7nm process node of the 870, while older, allows for higher sustained performance due to better thermal headroom. The Q5 Pro will handle demanding games and multitasking with ease, while the A96 may exhibit some slowdowns under heavy load. The Q5 Pro’s LPDDR5 RAM (assumed) will further enhance performance compared to the A96’s likely LPDDR4X.
Battery Life
The Oppo A96’s 33W charging is significantly slower than the Realme Q5 Pro’s 80W charging. The Q5 Pro can likely charge from 0-100% in under 40 minutes, while the A96 takes approximately 63 minutes. While the A96’s Snapdragon 695 is more power-efficient, the Q5 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the impact of potentially higher power consumption. The actual battery life will depend on usage patterns, but the Q5 Pro’s ability to quickly top up provides a convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A96 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with decent 5G connectivity and prioritize battery efficiency over raw power. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Realme Q5 Pro if you prefer a smoother experience with demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and value incredibly fast 80W charging – even if it means slightly reduced battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo A96 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is not designed for demanding games like Genshin Impact. While it can run them, you'll likely need to significantly lower the graphics settings and expect noticeable frame rate drops. The Realme Q5 Pro’s Snapdragon 870 will provide a much smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Realme Q5 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the Oppo A96 in real-world use?
The 80W charging on the Q5 Pro can add a significant amount of charge in a short period. You can expect to go from 0% to 50% in around 18-20 minutes, while the A96 will take closer to 45-50 minutes for the same charge level. This makes a huge difference if you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your phone.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 870 in the Realme Q5 Pro generate a lot of heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 is known for being relatively efficient, but it can still generate heat during extended gaming. However, Realme typically implements effective thermal management solutions, so throttling should be minimal. The A96’s Snapdragon 695 will run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
