Oppo's A96 (China variant) and K10x both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, targeting the competitive mid-range market. However, despite the identical core processing power, a key difference emerges in their charging capabilities, impacting daily usability and overall value. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K10x is the superior choice. While both phones offer the same Snapdragon 695 performance, the K10x’s 67W charging – capable of reaching 80% in just 33 minutes – significantly outperforms the A96’s 33W charging, offering a substantial convenience advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 12 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 12 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Blue, Black |
| Models | PFUM10 | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Oppo A96 (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 695 performance
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly slower 33W charging
- Limited information on display quality
- Camera specs are unknown
Oppo K10x
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (80% in 33 min)
- Reliable Snapdragon 695 performance
- Reduced downtime for power users
- Likely a higher price tag than the A96
- Limited information on display quality
- Camera specs are unknown
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A96 and K10x are expected to feature LCD panels, typical for this price segment. Specific details like resolution and refresh rate are not provided, but the focus here isn't display quality. The absence of LTPO technology means neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend on Oppo’s software calibration, a factor not detailed in the provided specs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipset, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend on sensor size, lens aperture, and image processing algorithms. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) suggests neither phone will have it, potentially resulting in less stable video recording and slightly blurrier low-light photos. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens is common in this segment, but its utility is often limited due to the low resolution.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) with an octa-core CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). This means similar performance in everyday tasks, app loading, and multitasking. However, sustained performance under heavy load could vary slightly depending on thermal design, which isn't specified. RAM configuration (LPDDR4x or LPDDR5) is unknown, but would impact multitasking smoothness. The 6nm process node offers a good balance of power efficiency and performance.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but the key differentiator is charging speed. The Oppo K10x boasts 67W wired charging, achieving 80% charge in just 33 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Oppo A96’s 33W charging, which takes 63 minutes to reach 100%. The faster charging of the K10x translates to less downtime and greater convenience, especially for users who frequently use power-intensive applications or games. The actual battery life will depend on the battery capacity, but the K10x’s charging speed mitigates concerns about battery drain.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A96 (China) if you prioritize a potentially lower initial purchase price and don't mind slower charging speeds. It's a solid option for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and charge overnight. Buy the Oppo K10x if you value rapid charging and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery throughout the day. Its 67W charging is a game-changer for busy individuals and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the K10x handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. The chipset isn't a flagship performer, so high graphics settings may lead to frame drops. Thermal management, which isn't detailed here, will also play a role in sustained performance.
❓ Does the Oppo K10x support VoLTE and 5G on all carriers?
Compatibility with VoLTE and 5G bands varies by region and carrier. It's crucial to check with your specific carrier to ensure the Oppo K10x is fully compatible with their network before purchasing. The Snapdragon 695 supports a wide range of 5G bands, but regional variations exist.
❓ Is the difference between 33W and 67W charging really that noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is substantial. 33W charging is adequate, but 67W charging provides a much faster top-up. If you often find yourself needing to quickly recharge your phone during the day, the K10x’s 67W charging will save you significant time and frustration. The K10x can gain a substantial charge during a short coffee break.
