Oppo A96 vs Oppo A78: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A96 (China) edges out the A78 thanks to its Snapdragon 695 chipset, offering slightly better overall performance and efficiency. While the A78 boasts a slightly faster charging time, the A96's processor gives it a noticeable advantage in daily tasks and gaming. Ultimately, the A96 provides a more robust experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A96 (China) | Oppo A78 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | IP54 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 12 | 2023, January 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 12 | Available. Released 2023, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple |
| Models | PFUM10 | CPH2483, CPH2495 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 |
Oppo A96 (China)
- Better overall performance
- More efficient chipset
- Slightly better image processing
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed
- Likely LCD display (unconfirmed)
Oppo A78
- Faster charging speed
- Stylish design
- Likely AMOLED display (unconfirmed)
- Lower performance compared to A96
- Less efficient chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.56-inch FHD+ display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth visual experience. The A78 might have slightly better color accuracy due to its panel type (likely AMOLED vs LCD on the A96, though this isn't definitively confirmed), but the difference is likely minimal for most users.
Camera Comparison
The A96 typically features a 48MP main camera, while the A78 has a 50MP main camera. While megapixels aren't everything, the A96's image processing often produces slightly more natural-looking photos. Both phones offer decent selfie cameras, but low-light performance is a weakness on both.
Performance
The Oppo A96 (China)'s Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a 6nm process, generally outperforms the A78's Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon 695 offers a more powerful GPU and CPU, resulting in snappier app loading times and better gaming performance. The A78 is still capable for everyday tasks, but the A96 feels more responsive.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life. The A78 charges slightly faster (52% in 30 mins vs 100% in 63 mins for the A96), but the A96's more efficient chipset can offset this difference in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A96 (China) is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a smoother experience, especially those who enjoy light gaming. The Oppo A78 is a great choice for those seeking a stylish design and faster charging speeds, and who primarily use their phone for everyday tasks like browsing and social media.