The Oppo A95 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A95, with its Snapdragon 662, aims for affordability and efficiency, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G leverages the newer Snapdragon 695 5G and significantly faster charging to deliver a more premium experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the A95’s Snapdragon 662, and the 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the A95 remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G provides better future-proofing and a more enjoyable user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Starry Black, Glowing Rainbow Silver | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | CHP2365, CPH2365 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo A95
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 for basic tasks
- Sufficient for everyday use
- Slower charging speeds (33W)
- Older Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 695 5G
- 5G connectivity for future networks
- Likely superior display quality (Super AMOLED)
- Higher price compared to Oppo A95
- Potential for software bloat (Xiaomi)
- May require more frequent software updates
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display, but differences exist. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are not provided for the Oppo A95, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is expected to have a Super AMOLED panel, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The absence of high refresh rate information for both suggests a standard 60Hz experience. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s AMOLED panel provides a visual advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is likely to feature a more advanced camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. The Oppo A95 likely relies on software optimization to enhance image quality. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s potential for better low-light performance and dynamic range is a key advantage, assuming a larger sensor and wider aperture.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), a significant upgrade over the Oppo A95’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 6nm process node of the 695 translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. The CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver in the 695 versus 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver in the 662 – favors the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, particularly in multi-threaded applications. The 5G modem in the 695 also provides future-proofing.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer. Achieving 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes (advertised) significantly reduces downtime compared to the Oppo A95’s 33W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 54%. While battery capacity isn't specified for either device, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially extending battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 if you need a reliable, basic smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize a lower upfront cost. It's ideal for users who don't heavily game or rely on fast charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, faster charging speeds, and 5G connectivity for future network compatibility. This is the better choice for media consumption and light to moderate gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. While not a flagship gaming chip, it offers a significant improvement over the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo A95, providing better frame rates and reduced lag.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the Oppo A95 in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is substantially faster. While the Oppo A95 takes 30 minutes to reach 54%, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can reach 50% in just 15 minutes and is fully charged in approximately 42 minutes. This translates to significantly less time tethered to a charger.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G useful right now, or is it just future-proofing?
5G availability varies greatly by region. In areas with 5G coverage, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds. Even without immediate 5G access, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is future-proofed for upcoming network deployments, offering a longer lifespan of optimal performance.
