The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A95 and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a 5G experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving that goal, primarily through their chipset choices. This comparison dives deep into the specifications and real-world implications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers significantly faster performance and smoother multitasking, justifying the slight price premium. While the Oppo A95 offers respectable battery charging speed, it can't match the A52s 5G's overall processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Starry Black, Glowing Rainbow Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | CHP2365, CPH2365 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 230 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A95
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Solid battery endurance
- Significantly weaker processor
- Likely less vibrant display
- May struggle with demanding tasks
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Much more powerful Snapdragon 778G
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Superior gaming performance
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to A95
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A95. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays are likely to utilize AMOLED technology (based on Samsung’s market positioning), the A52s 5G’s higher brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggest a more visually immersive experience. Bezels are likely comparable, but the A52s 5G’s superior panel quality is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise and potentially a larger main sensor (though sensor size is unspecified). While both may include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, the A52s 5G’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 778G will likely result in better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A52s 5G is also probable, further enhancing image and video stability.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Oppo A95 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, built on an 11nm process, while the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G features the Snapdragon 778G, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm node. This process difference is crucial; the 6nm node allows for higher transistor density and improved thermal efficiency. The 778G’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – is significantly more powerful than the A95’s Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the A52s 5G.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Oppo A95 compensates with faster 33W wired charging, achieving 54% charge in 30 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers 25W charging, which is slower. This means the A95 can top up its battery more quickly, but the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset may offset the slower charging speed with longer overall usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 if your primary needs are basic smartphone functionality – calls, texts, social media – and you prioritize fast 33W charging over raw performance. It’s a solid option for users upgrading from older, less capable devices. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you’re a more demanding user who enjoys mobile gaming, frequently uses multiple apps simultaneously, or values a brighter, more vibrant display. The 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost for a smoother, more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is built on a 6nm process, which offers excellent thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the A52s 5G is generally well-equipped to handle it without significant throttling, providing a consistently smooth gaming experience. The Oppo A95's Snapdragon 662 will likely throttle sooner under similar load.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on phones in this price range offer limited utility. Image quality is often subpar, lacking detail and sharpness. While they can be fun for experimentation, don't base your purchasing decision on the presence of a macro lens. The A52s 5G's superior main sensor will deliver far more usable results.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high graphics settings with smooth frame rates. It can likely sustain 60fps gameplay, providing a competitive edge. The Oppo A95, with its Snapdragon 662, will likely require lower settings to achieve playable frame rates.
❓ How does the charging speed difference impact daily use between the A95 and A52s 5G?
The A95's 33W charging is noticeably faster, allowing you to quickly top up the battery during short breaks. However, the A52s 5G's more efficient chipset means you may not need to charge as frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed. If you often find yourself needing a quick boost, the A95 is preferable; otherwise, the A52s 5G's efficiency is a strong advantage.
