Oppo's A-series consistently delivers impressive features at affordable prices. The Oppo A95 and A94 are two popular contenders in this space, offering a blend of style and functionality. But which one is the better choice for your needs?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A95 edges out the A94 thanks to its faster Snapdragon 662 chipset, quicker 33W charging, and slightly improved overall performance. While the A94 remains a solid option, the A95 provides a more modern and responsive experience for a similar price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2021, March 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2021, March 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4310 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Starry Black, Glowing Rainbow Silver | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple |
| Models | CHP2365, CPH2365 | CPH2203 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Oppo A95
- Faster Snapdragon 662 Chipset
- 33W Fast Charging
- Slightly Improved Performance
- Good Battery Life
- Design is similar to A94
- No significant camera upgrades
Oppo A94
- Sleek Design
- Decent Camera Performance
- Affordable Price
- Good Battery Life
- Slower Helio P95 Chipset
- 30W Charging
- Less Responsive Performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate. While the quality is similar, the A95 might offer slightly better color accuracy due to potential software optimizations. Viewing angles and brightness are comparable on both devices.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A94 boasts a 48MP main camera, while the A95 also features a 48MP main camera. Both phones offer a similar camera setup with ultrawide, macro, and depth sensors. Image quality is generally good in well-lit conditions, but the A95's newer chipset might offer slightly better image processing and low-light performance.
Performance
The Oppo A95's Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the A94's MediaTek Helio P95. The Snapdragon 662 is generally more efficient and handles demanding tasks with greater ease. Expect smoother multitasking and better gaming performance on the A95.
Battery Life
The Oppo A95 packs a 5000mAh battery, similar to the A94. However, the A95's 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the A94's 30W charging. Expect a full charge in roughly 70-80 minutes on the A95 and 90-100 minutes on the A94.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A95 is ideal for users prioritizing performance and faster charging. It's a great choice for those who enjoy gaming or multitasking. The Oppo A94 is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who value a sleek design and a decent camera, but don't need top-tier performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A95 worth the upgrade from the A94?
If you prioritize performance and faster charging, then yes, the A95 is a worthwhile upgrade. The Snapdragon 662 chipset offers a noticeable improvement in speed and responsiveness.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones offer comparable battery life, lasting a full day with moderate usage. However, the A95's faster charging means you'll spend less time plugged in.
