The Oppo A95 and OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G both target the affordable 5G smartphone market, but they approach it with different strategies. The A95 represents a more established design, while the Nord CE 2 Lite aims for a newer chipset and faster connectivity. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo A95’s Snapdragon 662. While both offer 33W charging, the Nord CE 2 Lite’s modern architecture translates to a smoother overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2022, April 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2022, April 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Starry Black, Glowing Rainbow Silver | Black Dusk, Blue Tide |
| Models | CHP2365, CPH2365 | CPH2381, CPH2409 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A95
- Familiar Oppo UI
- Reliable 33W charging
- Generally lower price point (depending on region)
- Older Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Less efficient 11nm process
- Potentially slower 5G speeds
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- 6nm process for better efficiency
- Faster 5G connectivity
- Improved ISP for better image processing
- OxygenOS may not appeal to all users
- Potentially slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor OnePlus provide display specs beyond resolution in their marketing materials. However, both likely utilize LCD panels given their price points. The key difference lies in the underlying processing power to drive the display. The Snapdragon 695’s improved GPU will likely result in smoother scrolling and animations, even if the panels themselves are similar. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 695’s improved image signal processor (ISP) in the Nord CE 2 Lite 5G will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. While both phones likely feature a standard main sensor, the 695’s ISP can handle more complex algorithms for noise reduction and dynamic range. The A95’s ISP, being older, will be more limited in its capabilities. We anticipate the Nord CE 2 Lite to produce more detailed and vibrant photos.
Performance
The core differentiator here is the chipset. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) boasts a significant architectural advantage over the Oppo A95’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 695 features Kryo 660 Gold cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the A95’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This, combined with the smaller fabrication node, translates to approximately 15-20% better CPU performance and a more substantial improvement in GPU capabilities. This benefits gaming and multitasking. The 695 also includes an integrated 5G modem, offering faster download and upload speeds.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 33W wired charging, with Oppo claiming 54% charge in 30 minutes for the A95. The Nord CE 2 Lite 5G also supports 33W charging, and while a precise time-to-charge isn’t advertised, the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm efficiency should result in slightly lower power consumption during charging and usage, potentially extending battery life despite similar capacity expectations. The more efficient chipset will also reduce heat generation, contributing to longer battery health over time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 if you prioritize a familiar design and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Its Snapdragon 662 is adequate for these scenarios. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G if you want a phone that can handle more demanding apps, occasional gaming, and benefit from the faster 5G connectivity offered by the Snapdragon 695, all while maintaining a similar price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Nord CE 2 Lite 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low for a consistently smooth experience. The Snapdragon 662 in the A95 will struggle with higher settings and may exhibit more noticeable frame drops.
❓ Does the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 supports carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for significantly faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. The Snapdragon 662 has limited carrier aggregation capabilities.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the two phones noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. While both phones can handle basic tasks, the Nord CE 2 Lite 5G feels snappier and more responsive when switching between apps, browsing the web, and opening applications due to the more powerful chipset and efficient architecture.
❓ How does the 33W charging compare in real-world usage on both devices?
Both phones charge at the same wattage, but the Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s more efficient chipset may result in slightly faster overall charging times and less heat generation during the process. Oppo claims 54% in 30 minutes for the A95, and the Nord CE 2 Lite should be comparable or slightly faster.
