Motorola Edge 20 Fusion vs. Oppo A95: A Detailed Performance and Value Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and 5G connectivity, the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 800U chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Oppo A95’s Snapdragon 662. However, the A95’s slightly faster 33W charging provides a marginal convenience for those frequently topping up their battery.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A95 | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glowing Starry Black, Glowing Rainbow Silver | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | CHP2365, CPH2365 | - |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo A95
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Less powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Limited gaming performance
- May lack 5G connectivity
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Smoother multitasking and gaming experience
- Slightly slower 30W charging
- Potentially higher price
- May experience more heat under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The chipset’s ability to efficiently render graphics impacts perceived smoothness, giving the Edge 20 Fusion an advantage. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration, a detail not provided.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the processing capabilities of the Dimensity 800U in the Edge 20 Fusion suggest superior image processing, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Snapdragon 662 is capable, but the Edge 20 Fusion’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) benefits from the more advanced chipset architecture. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U, fabricated on a 7nm process, represents a substantial leap in performance over the Oppo A95’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The Dimensity 800U’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, provides significantly more processing power for demanding applications and multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 662’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother gaming, and a more responsive user experience. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While RAM specifications are missing, the chipset difference is the dominant factor.
Battery Life
The Oppo A95’s 33W wired charging offers a slight advantage over the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging. Oppo claims 54% charge in 30 minutes, suggesting a faster initial charging rate. However, battery capacity is unknown for both devices. A larger battery in the Edge 20 Fusion could offset the slightly slower charging speed, providing longer overall usage. The Dimensity 800U’s improved efficiency may also contribute to better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption, and value a slightly faster charging experience. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prioritize smoother multitasking, more demanding gaming, and future-proof 5G connectivity, even if it means a slightly slower charging speed.