The Oppo A95 and Honor X9 5G represent a growing segment of affordable 5G smartphones. Both aim to deliver connectivity without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different approaches to chipset selection and charging technology. This comparison dissects the core differences between the Snapdragon 662-powered Oppo A95 and the Snapdragon 695 5G-equipped Honor X9 5G, revealing which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor X9 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift and future-proofs the device with 5G capabilities. The significantly faster 66W charging also drastically reduces downtime, making it the more practical option despite a potentially similar price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2022, March 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 66W wired, 81% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Starry Black, Glowing Rainbow Silver | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | CHP2365, CPH2365 | ANY-NX1 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 240 EUR |
Oppo A95
- Familiar Oppo ColorOS interface
- Potentially lower price point
- Adequate 33W charging for light users
- Older Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Less efficient 11nm process
- No integrated 5G modem
Honor X9 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Faster 66W charging
- Integrated 5G modem for future-proof connectivity
- May have a slightly higher price
- Honor’s Magic UI may not appeal to all users
- Potential for software update delays
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Honor provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels. The key difference will likely be in color calibration and brightness. Without further data, it's reasonable to assume similar viewing experiences, but the Honor X9 5G's newer chipset *could* support more advanced display features if Honor chose to implement them.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image signal processing (ISP). The Snapdragon 695’s newer ISP in the Honor X9 5G will likely offer improved noise reduction and dynamic range compared to the Oppo A95’s Snapdragon 662. The presence of a 5G modem also allows for faster uploads of photos and videos. It's likely both phones will feature similar primary camera resolutions, but the Honor X9 5G has the potential for superior image quality due to its more advanced processing capabilities.
Performance
The core differentiator here is the chipset. The Honor X9 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) represents a significant leap over the Oppo A95’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance during demanding tasks. The CPU configuration also favors the Honor device, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores versus the Oppo’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This means the Honor X9 5G will handle multitasking and app launches more smoothly. The Snapdragon 695 also includes an integrated 5G modem, a feature absent in the 662.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the charging speeds tell a compelling story. The Honor X9 5G’s 66W charging can reach 81% in 30 minutes, while the Oppo A95’s 33W charging only manages 54% in the same timeframe. This means significantly less time tethered to a charger with the Honor device. Even if the Oppo A95 has a slightly larger battery, the Honor X9 5G’s faster charging effectively mitigates any capacity difference, providing a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 if you prioritize a familiar Oppo ColorOS experience and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. The 33W charging is adequate for casual users. Buy the Honor X9 5G if you want a more responsive experience, benefit from 5G connectivity, and value faster charging speeds for minimal interruptions. It’s the better choice for gamers and those who frequently multitask.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor X9 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a smooth experience. While not a gaming powerhouse, it offers a noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo A95, providing more stable frame rates and less lag during intense gameplay.
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the Honor X9 5G compared to the Oppo A95 in real-world use?
The Honor X9 5G’s 66W charging can add 81% charge in 30 minutes, while the Oppo A95 only manages 54%. This translates to roughly 30-40 minutes less time plugged into the wall for a full charge, making the Honor X9 5G significantly more convenient for users who are frequently on the go.
❓ Does the Honor X9 5G support all 5G bands available in the US?
5G band support varies by region and carrier. You'll need to check the specific model number of the Honor X9 5G and compare its supported bands with your carrier's 5G network to ensure compatibility. The Snapdragon 695 supports a wide range of 5G bands, but not all variants are enabled on every device.
