The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Oppo A95 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021. Both offer compelling features at accessible price points, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A95 5G takes the lead thanks to its 5G connectivity, faster charging, and more powerful chipset. However, the Redmi Note 8 2021 boasts exceptional battery life and a potentially better display contrast, making it a strong contender for users prioritizing endurance and visual fidelity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2021, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2021, May 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 158.3 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm (6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Neptune Blue, Moonlight White, Space Black |
| Models | PELM00 | M1908C3JGG |
| Price | - | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.75 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 102h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1487:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 180195 (v8), 165779 (v9)
GeekBench: 5259 (v4.4), 1314 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A95 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Faster Performance (Dimensity 800U)
- 30W Fast Charging
- Modern Chipset
- Battery Life Not as Exceptional as Redmi Note 8 2021
- Display details less clear
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
- Exceptional Battery Life (102h Endurance)
- High Contrast Ratio Display
- Budget-Friendly Price
- Slower Performance (Helio G85)
- 18W Charging
- Older Chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays with impressive contrast ratios (1487:1). The Redmi Note 8 2021 boasts a measured peak brightness of 620 nits, which could offer a slightly better viewing experience in direct sunlight. The Oppo A95 5G likely has a slightly more modern display panel, but specific details are less readily available. Resolution and panel type (AMOLED vs LCD) are key differentiators not explicitly stated.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences. Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed specifications (megapixels, aperture, features) are missing. The Oppo A95 5G likely has a more modern image processing pipeline, potentially resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. However, the Redmi Note 8 2021's camera might offer a unique aesthetic.
Performance
The Oppo A95 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset is significantly more powerful than the Redmi Note 8 2021's Helio G85. This translates to smoother performance in demanding apps and games, and faster overall responsiveness. The 7nm process of the Dimensity 800U also contributes to better power efficiency compared to the 12nm Helio G85.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 8 2021's standout feature is its exceptional battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 102 hours. This is significantly better than the Oppo A95 5G, which, while still offering good battery life, doesn't reach the same level. The Oppo A95 5G's 30W fast charging compensates somewhat for its shorter battery life, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A95 5G is ideal for users who want 5G connectivity, faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and quicker charging. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 is a great choice for those prioritizing long battery life, a vibrant display, and a budget-friendly price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo A95 5G is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset and faster processor.
❓ How long will the Redmi Note 8 2021's battery last?
The Redmi Note 8 2021 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 102 hours, meaning it can easily last for multiple days on a single charge with moderate usage.
