The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT and Oppo A95 5G represent distinct approaches to the mid-range 5G smartphone market. The Poco F3 GT aggressively targets gamers with a flagship-level chipset and rapid charging, while the Oppo A95 5G aims for a balance of features and affordability. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming capabilities, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U and 30W charging. However, the Oppo A95 5G remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who don't demand top-tier gaming performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | PELM00 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A95 5G
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful processor for gaming
- Likely inferior camera performance
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Flagship-level Dimensity 1200 processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Superior gaming performance
- Higher price tag
- Potentially less battery life (depending on capacity)
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in their processing power, impacting gaming smoothness. The Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200 will drive higher, more consistent frame rates in graphically intensive games. Display specs like resolution and refresh rate are missing, but the chipset difference is the primary factor for gamers. The Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U is sufficient for casual gaming but will struggle with demanding titles at maximum settings.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Poco F3 GT’s gaming focus, it’s reasonable to expect a more robust camera system optimized for social media sharing. The Oppo A95 5G likely prioritizes affordability, potentially resulting in a less sophisticated camera setup. Sensor size and aperture are critical factors, but without that data, we can only infer that the F3 GT likely offers better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence or absence of OIS would also be a key differentiator.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Dimensity 1200 boasts a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three additional A78 cores at 2.6 GHz, versus the A95 5G’s dual 2.4 GHz A76 cores. This architectural advantage translates to significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The A95 5G will be adequate for daily tasks, but the F3 GT offers a far superior experience for demanding users.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 GT’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a game-changer, achieving a 100% charge in just 42 minutes. The Oppo A95 5G’s 30W charging takes 48 minutes to reach full capacity. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Poco F3 GT mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery size. This rapid charging is particularly beneficial for gamers who need to quickly top up their device between sessions.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 5G if you need a reliable 5G smartphone for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize a lower price point. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you are a mobile gamer who demands high frame rates, fast charging, and a more powerful processor for demanding applications and sustained performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200’s 6nm process node and potential for advanced cooling solutions (details not provided) should mitigate overheating. However, sustained high performance will inevitably generate heat. The Poco F3 GT is likely designed with thermal management in mind, but throttling may occur during extremely demanding games.
❓ Is the Oppo A95 5G suitable for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. Expect some frame drops during intense firefights. It’s not ideal for competitive PUBG gaming, but it’s playable for casual users.
❓ Does the Poco F3 GT support high refresh rate gaming?
While the refresh rate isn't specified, the Dimensity 1200 is capable of driving high refresh rate displays. It's highly probable the Poco F3 GT supports at least 120Hz, providing a smoother gaming experience.
❓ How does the charging speed difference impact daily use?
The 67W charging on the Poco F3 GT means you can quickly top up the battery during short breaks, ideal for gamers. The Oppo A95 5G’s 30W charging requires a longer commitment to reach full capacity, making it less convenient for users who need a quick boost.
