Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G vs Oppo A95 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 780G chipset, built on a more efficient 5nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management compared to the Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Mi 11 Lite’s brighter display and faster charging add to its overall appeal.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A95 5G | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 642 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Truffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow |
| Models | PELM00 | M2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 106h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) | 522490 (v9) GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A95 5G
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera system
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 780G chipset
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Faster 33W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery life to Oppo A95 5G
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 846 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Oppo A95 5G, for which display brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Mi 11 Lite’s higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio suggest a superior viewing experience. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, but the Mi 11 Lite’s overall display quality is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of the Mi 11 Lite suggests a more refined camera system with potentially better image processing. The Oppo A95 5G, being a more budget-focused device, likely prioritizes quantity of lenses over quality. We can assume the Mi 11 Lite will deliver more consistent and detailed images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G (5nm) is a more advanced processor than the Oppo A95 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 800U (7nm). The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 780G translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling under sustained load. While both CPUs feature octa-core architectures with similar peak clock speeds (2.4 GHz), the Snapdragon 780G’s Kryo 670 cores offer superior single-core and multi-core performance. This difference will be most noticeable in gaming and demanding applications. The Mi 11 Lite also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds (LPDDR5 vs potentially LPDDR4X in the A95 5G, though not explicitly stated).
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 106 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G offers faster 33W wired charging with support for PD3.0 and QC4, allowing for a quicker top-up compared to the Oppo A95 5G’s 30W charging. The Mi 11 Lite can reach 100% charge in a shorter timeframe, mitigating any potential battery life differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 5G if you prioritize a slightly faster charging speed (30W vs 33W) and are looking for the absolute lowest price point. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G if you value smoother performance in demanding applications, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more refined overall user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.