The mid-range 5G market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A95 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options. The A95 5G aims to deliver solid performance at an attractive price point, while the A52s 5G leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 778G for a more refined experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management compared to the Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U. While the A95 5G charges slightly faster, the A52s 5G’s overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | PELM00 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | - | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A95 5G
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Older chipset architecture
- Less efficient processor
- Display specs are less impressive
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Better power efficiency and thermal management
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Software update longevity may vary
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, which significantly improves outdoor visibility compared to the Oppo A95 5G (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the A52s 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience. The lack of detailed display specs for the A95 5G makes a precise comparison difficult, but the A52s 5G clearly holds an advantage in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise and potentially a larger main sensor (spec data unavailable). The focus should be on real-world image samples, but the Snapdragon 778G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more advanced than the Dimensity 800U’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. Avoid placing too much weight on the presence of 2MP macro lenses on either device, as their image quality is typically subpar.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core – compared to the Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). The 778G’s architecture, combined with the smaller process node, translates to superior single-core and multi-core performance, and crucially, better power efficiency. This means less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Dimensity 800U’s Cortex-A76 cores are older generation, and while capable, they fall behind the A78 in performance. The A52s 5G will deliver a smoother experience in demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Oppo A95 5G’s faster 30W charging (100% in 48 minutes) versus the A52s 5G’s 25W charging. The Snapdragon 778G’s superior efficiency may offset the A95 5G’s faster charging, resulting in comparable daily usage. The A95 5G’s quicker top-up time is a benefit for users who frequently need a rapid charge, but the A52s 5G’s efficiency could translate to longer screen-on time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 5G if your priority is maximizing value and you primarily engage in casual smartphone use like social media and light browsing. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize smoother performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more refined user experience and potentially longer software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is known for its excellent thermal efficiency. While it will get warm during prolonged gaming, its 6nm process and optimized architecture minimize throttling, maintaining consistent performance for longer periods compared to the Dimensity 800U.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Oppo A95 5G significantly faster in real-world use?
While 30W is faster than the A52s 5G’s 25W, the difference in charging time isn’t massive. The A95 5G reaches 100% in 48 minutes, and the A52s 5G will likely take around 55-60 minutes. The convenience of a slightly faster charge is offset by the A52s 5G’s superior efficiency.
❓ How does the Dimensity 800U handle graphically demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 800U can run PUBG and Genshin Impact, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G offers a more comfortable experience, allowing for higher settings and more consistent performance in these titles.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates and security patches?
Samsung generally provides longer software support for its devices compared to Oppo. While both brands are improving, the A52s 5G is likely to receive more major Android updates and security patches over its lifespan.
