The mid-range 5G smartphone market is booming, offering incredible value. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Oppo A95 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. But which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G edges out the Oppo A95 5G thanks to its superior display, longer software support, and generally more refined user experience. While the Oppo boasts faster charging, the A23's strengths make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA
8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | PELM00 | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | - | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 138h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318821 (v9)
GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A95 5G
- Faster Charging (30W)
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Competitive price
- Less vibrant display
- Potentially shorter software support
- Less refined user experience
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Longer software support (Samsung's promise)
- More polished user experience
- Potentially better camera
- Slower charging (25W)
- Slightly less powerful chipset
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G takes the display crown. While both offer a 1328:1 contrast ratio, the A23's measured 508 nits brightness is noticeably higher, resulting in better visibility outdoors. The A23 also likely has a slightly better panel quality overall, offering more accurate colors and better viewing angles. The Oppo A95 5G's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the A23.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more detailed testing. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is expected to have better image processing and potentially better low-light performance due to Samsung's established camera software. The A23's video recording capabilities are also likely to be slightly superior.
Performance
The Oppo A95 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset offers a slight edge in raw processing power, potentially benefiting demanding games. However, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G is also quite capable and benefits from Qualcomm's optimization. Real-world performance differences are likely minimal for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with an endurance rating of 138 hours. This suggests excellent all-day performance for both devices. However, the Oppo A95 5G's 30W charging is faster than the A23's 25W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A95 5G? Users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more powerful chipset for gaming might lean towards the Oppo. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G? Those seeking a vibrant display, longer software updates, and a more polished Samsung experience will find the A23 a better fit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is expected to receive longer software updates and security patches due to Samsung's commitment to providing updates for their devices.
❓ Is the Oppo A95 5G good for gaming?
The Oppo A95 5G's chipset offers decent gaming performance, but it's not a dedicated gaming phone. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is also capable, but neither phone excels in this area.
