OnePlus Nord 2 5G vs Oppo A95 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset provides significantly faster performance, coupled with 65W SuperVOOC charging that replenishes the battery in just 30 minutes. While the A95 5G offers a reasonable experience, the Nord 2 5G’s advantages justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A95 5G | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | PELM00 | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | - | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A95 5G
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Acceptable battery life
- Slower processor compared to Nord 2 5G
- Slower charging speed (48 minutes)
- Display brightness likely lower than Nord 2 5G
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Significantly faster Dimensity 1200 processor
- Ultra-fast 65W SuperVOOC charging (30 minutes)
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potential for more heat generation under heavy load
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 633 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A95 5G. While both likely utilize OLED panels (based on brand trends), the Nord 2’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The Nord 2’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical OLED experience with perfect blacks, while the A95 5G’s display characteristics remain less defined. The lack of high refresh rate information for the A95 5G puts it at a disadvantage against potential 90Hz or 120Hz options found in competing Nord models.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The Nord 2 5G likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 1200, enabling better noise reduction and dynamic range. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, OnePlus typically prioritizes camera performance in the Nord series, suggesting a more refined camera experience. The A95 5G’s camera system is likely more focused on providing a versatile set of features at a lower cost, potentially sacrificing some image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Nord 2 5G features the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) while the A95 5G uses the Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Dimensity 1200’s octa-core configuration – with a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three additional A78 cores at 2.6 GHz – offers a substantial performance leap over the A95 5G’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 also contributes to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Nord 2 5G.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 102 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Nord 2 5G’s 65W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, fully charging the battery in just 30 minutes. The A95 5G’s 30W charging takes 48 minutes to reach 100%, a significant difference for users who value quick top-ups. While the A95 5G’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Nord 2 5G effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 5G if you prioritize affordability and a balanced feature set without demanding peak performance. It’s a good option for everyday tasks and casual gaming. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you value faster processing speeds for demanding apps, smoother gaming, and significantly quicker charging times, even if it means spending a bit more.