The Motorola Moto G100S and Oppo A95 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at accessible price points, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in their respective chipsets. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Moto G100S emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a performance edge and potentially better thermal management compared to the Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2025, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2025, November 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Black, Blue |
| Models | PELM00 | - |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
Oppo A95 5G
- Oppo’s ColorOS is generally well-optimized.
- Proven chipset with established software support.
- Fast 30W charging.
- Older 7nm process node leads to lower efficiency.
- Cortex-A76 cores are less performant than A78.
- Potential for throttling under sustained load.
Motorola Moto G100S
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset.
- Modern Cortex-A78 CPU cores for improved performance.
- Potentially better thermal management.
- Motorola’s software update track record is less consistent.
- Snapdragon 6-series historically lacks flagship features.
- May require more software optimization to reach full potential.
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are absent, but considering the market positioning, both likely feature LCD panels. The key difference lies under the hood. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s 4nm fabrication allows for potentially more efficient display driving, though the impact is minimal without knowing panel specifics. The Oppo A95 5G, with its Dimensity 800U, may require slightly more power to maintain similar brightness levels. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend heavily on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s ISP is likely more advanced, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U ISP is capable, but may lag behind in complex scenarios. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend more on sensor size and lens quality, which are currently unknown. We anticipate both will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G100S’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) boasts Cortex-A78 cores, a more modern architecture than the Cortex-A76 cores found in the Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). While both are octa-core CPUs with similar clock speeds (2.4GHz peak), the A78 cores offer superior Instructions Per Clock (IPC), translating to faster performance in single-threaded tasks and improved overall responsiveness. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon further enhances efficiency, reducing heat generation and potentially preventing performance throttling during extended use. The G100S is likely to handle demanding applications and multitasking more smoothly.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 30W wired charging, achieving a full charge in approximately 48 minutes. The actual battery capacity is unknown, but the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s superior efficiency could translate to longer battery life on the Motorola Moto G100S, even with a similar capacity battery. The 4nm process reduces power consumption, allowing the G100S to extract more usage from each charge. The Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U, while efficient, is less so than its Snapdragon counterpart.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 5G if you prioritize a proven track record of software optimization within the Oppo ecosystem and are looking for a reliable daily driver for basic tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G100S if you value raw processing power for multitasking, light gaming, and appreciate the benefits of a newer, more efficient chipset architecture, even if Motorola’s software update commitment is less certain.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G100S overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s 4nm process and improved thermal design should mitigate overheating issues better than the Oppo A95 5G’s Dimensity 800U. While it won’t match flagship cooling, it’s likely to sustain performance for longer periods without significant throttling.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Motorola and Oppo?
Oppo’s ColorOS is a heavily customized Android skin known for its features and optimization, but also its pre-installed bloatware. Motorola’s My UX is closer to stock Android, offering a cleaner experience with fewer customizations, but potentially less granular control. Motorola’s update commitment is generally shorter than Oppo’s.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference will be minimal. However, when multitasking, running demanding apps, or playing graphically intensive games, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 in the Moto G100S will provide a smoother and more responsive experience.
