Oppo A95 5G vs Google Pixel 5a 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter display, the Oppo A95 5G emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset and 30W charging offer a noticeable edge, while the Pixel 5a 5G excels in software and camera processing, but falls behind in raw speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A95 5G | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 48 min | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Mostly Black |
| Models | PELM00 | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | - | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A95 5G
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially stronger CPU performance
- Likely brighter display (based on brand trends)
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Camera performance is unknown without detailed specs
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Excellent camera image processing
- Guaranteed software updates from Google
- Brighter display (861 nits)
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially weaker CPU performance in demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 5a 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 861 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we'd expect from the Oppo A95 5G, making the Pixel more usable in direct sunlight. While the Oppo’s display specs are not provided, the Pixel’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong OLED panel. The lack of high refresh rate on either device is standard for this price bracket, but the Pixel’s brightness is a clear win for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Oppo A95 5G, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Pixel 5a 5G is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms to deliver consistently excellent results, even in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel’s image processing is a significant advantage, compensating for potentially smaller sensor sizes. The Oppo likely relies more on hardware specifications, and without knowing those, it’s difficult to assess its camera capabilities beyond assuming a standard mid-range performance.
Performance
Both the Oppo A95 5G and Google Pixel 5a 5G utilize 7nm process nodes, but their chipsets differ significantly. The Oppo leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 800U, featuring a dual-cluster CPU with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Pixel 5a 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, with a 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold core, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. While peak clock speeds are similar, the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 800U generally offer superior single-core performance. The Snapdragon 765G’s strength lies in its optimized GPU, potentially providing a slight edge in some gaming scenarios, but the Dimensity 800U’s CPU architecture provides a more robust all-around experience.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an impressive endurance rating of 122 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Oppo A95 5G supports 30W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 48 minutes. The Pixel 5a 5G is limited to 18W charging with PD2.0, resulting in a significantly longer charging time. This difference is crucial for users who prioritize quick top-ups, making the Oppo a more convenient option.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A95 5G if you need faster charging speeds, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and prioritize raw processing power for demanding applications. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you value Google’s clean software experience, exceptional computational photography, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some processing speed and charging convenience.