Both the Oppo A94 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but they approach it with vastly different strategies. The Oppo A94 focuses on a balanced experience, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) prioritizes raw performance and incredibly fast charging speeds. This comparison dissects these differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Oppo A94’s Helio P95 and 30W charging, justifying the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 05 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 11 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CPH2203 | - |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oppo A94
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable everyday performance for basic tasks
- Decent camera for casual photography
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful processor for gaming and demanding apps
- Older chipset architecture
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Extremely fast 67W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 1100 processor
- Superior gaming performance
- More efficient 6nm process
- Potentially higher price
- May generate more heat under extreme load (though mitigated by 6nm)
- China-specific model may have software limitations
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies beneath the hood. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s processor will allow for smoother scrolling and faster app loading. The Oppo A94’s Helio P95, being a 12nm process, will likely generate more heat under sustained load, potentially impacting display brightness over extended periods. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s superior processing power gives it an edge in rendering visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 1100 chipset will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Oppo A94’s Helio P95 ISP is adequate, but won’t match the capabilities of the Dimensity 1100. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is more likely to support advanced features like 4K video recording at higher frame rates. We can assume both phones will have a standard set of camera modes, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro will likely offer superior image quality and processing speed.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 1100, a 6nm chip with four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz. This is a significant upgrade over the Oppo A94’s Helio P95 (12nm), which uses older Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 1100 translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, meaning sustained performance is higher. Gamers and power users will immediately notice the difference in responsiveness and frame rates.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)’s 67W charging is a game-changer. Xiaomi claims a full charge in just 42 minutes, a massive advantage over the Oppo A94’s 30W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential difference in mAh. The Dimensity 1100’s 6nm efficiency also contributes to better battery life under load, meaning the Redmi Note 10 Pro will likely last longer during intensive tasks like gaming.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A94 if you need a reliable, everyday smartphone with a decent camera and don't heavily rely on demanding applications or gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize gaming, fast charging, and a more future-proof processor, even if it means potentially spending a bit more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) likely to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1100 is a powerful chip, its 6nm manufacturing process is more efficient than the Oppo A94’s Helio P95 (12nm). This means it will generate less heat under load, reducing the likelihood of significant thermal throttling during gaming. However, sustained high performance will inevitably produce some heat, so a gaming-focused case might be beneficial.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 10 Pro's 67W charging affect battery health over time?
Modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging algorithms to minimize battery degradation. While faster charging *can* theoretically contribute to slightly faster degradation over years of use, the benefits of the convenience and speed of 67W charging generally outweigh the minimal long-term impact. Xiaomi likely incorporates safeguards to protect battery health.
❓ Will the Oppo A94 struggle with demanding apps like video editing software?
The Helio P95 in the Oppo A94 is capable of handling basic tasks, but it will likely struggle with demanding applications like video editing. The processing power and memory bandwidth are simply not on par with the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro, resulting in slower rendering times and potential lag.
