The Oppo A94 and Realme 8 Pro represent a sweet spot in the smartphone market, offering a blend of features without the flagship price tag. Both devices aim to deliver a solid all-around experience, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The A94 relies on MediaTek’s Helio P95, while the 8 Pro champions Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 720G. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 8 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 720G, built on an 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance and efficiency advantage over the Oppo A94’s 12nm Helio P95. Coupled with significantly faster 50W charging, the 8 Pro offers a more refined and future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 05 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 11 | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | CPH2203 | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A94
- Potentially more conservative design aesthetic.
- Adequate performance for basic tasks.
- Similar battery endurance to the Realme 8 Pro.
- Less efficient Helio P95 chipset.
- Slower 30W charging.
- Likely lower sustained performance due to thermal throttling.
Realme 8 Pro
- More efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset.
- Significantly faster 50W charging.
- Better sustained performance for gaming and demanding apps.
- Design may be less appealing to some.
- Potentially slightly higher price point.
- Similar battery endurance to the Oppo A94.
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A94 and Realme 8 Pro boast displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both displays are adequate for everyday use, but neither is likely to excel in direct sunlight or for color-critical work. The Realme 8 Pro’s display benefits from the overall chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) potentially offering better image processing for display output.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The Realme 8 Pro’s ISP, tied to the Snapdragon 720G, likely provides superior image processing capabilities. While megapixel counts aren’t specified, the Snapdragon’s image processing pipeline generally excels in dynamic range and noise reduction. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Realme 8 Pro’s chipset provides a stronger foundation for camera performance. The absence of details on OIS or aperture sizes further complicates a direct comparison.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) features Kryo 465 Gold cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, while the Oppo A94’s Helio P95 (12nm) has Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 720G is a significant advantage, offering better thermal efficiency and sustained performance under load. This translates to less throttling during extended gaming sessions and smoother multitasking. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences and fabrication process give the Snapdragon 720G a clear edge in raw processing power and power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 116 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme 8 Pro’s 50W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. The Oppo A94’s 30W charging is respectable, but considerably slower. This charging speed disparity is a major advantage for the Realme 8 Pro, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A94 if you prioritize a slightly more conservative design and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value performance for gaming and demanding apps, faster charging speeds, and a more efficient chipset that will likely hold up better over time.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 8nm process and optimized GPU contribute to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of significant frame drops during extended gaming sessions compared to the Oppo A94’s Helio P95.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro compared to the 30W charging on the Oppo A94 in real-world use?
The Realme 8 Pro’s 50W charging can take a phone from 0% to 100% in approximately 47 minutes, while the Oppo A94’s 30W charging will take considerably longer. This means you can get a significant charge boost in a much shorter time with the Realme 8 Pro, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
❓ Does the Helio P95 in the Oppo A94 struggle with multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously?
The Helio P95 can handle basic multitasking, but it may exhibit some slowdown or lag when running numerous apps concurrently, especially more demanding ones. The Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro offers a smoother multitasking experience due to its more efficient architecture and processing power.
