Both the Oppo A94 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G market, offering connectivity at accessible price points. However, beneath the similar exterior lies a crucial difference in chipset and charging capabilities, impacting performance and user experience. This comparison dives deep into these distinctions to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and faster charging, the Oppo A94 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset provides a slight performance edge, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Redmi Note 10 5G’s 18W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 16 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 03 | Available. Released 2021, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD, QC | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray, Nighttime Blue, Aurora Green |
| Models | CPH2211 | M2103K19G, M2103K19C |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 96.62 / £ 107.59 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1795:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.0 LUFS (Good)
|
Oppo A94 5G
- Faster 30W charging with PD/QC support
- Slightly more powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- Potentially smoother performance in demanding apps
- No specified refresh rate (likely 60Hz)
- Camera specs lack detail
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
- Excellent battery endurance (121h rating)
- Bright display (492 nits measured)
- Competitive price point
- Slower 18W charging
- Dimensity 700 chipset offers less headroom
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar contrast ratio of 1795:1, suggesting comparable visual depth. However, the Redmi Note 10 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 492 nits, offering a potentially more visible display in direct sunlight. While both manufacturers report similar nominal contrast ratios, real-world viewing experiences may vary based on panel quality and calibration. Neither device specifies refresh rates, implying a standard 60Hz panel on both, which is typical for this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on multi-camera setups with a primary sensor likely around 48MP. The absence of OIS on either device suggests image stabilization will be primarily digital, potentially resulting in softer images in low-light conditions. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro cameras on either device is questionable, offering limited image quality improvements.
Performance
The Oppo A94 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset, built on a 7nm process, features a slightly higher clocked CPU (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76) compared to the Redmi Note 10 5G’s Dimensity 700 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76). This clock speed difference, coupled with the 800U’s generally more powerful GPU, translates to a noticeable, though not dramatic, performance advantage in demanding applications and gaming. Both utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, ensuring similar power efficiency during less intensive tasks. The Redmi Note 10 5G’s Dimensity 700 is still a capable performer, but the A94 5G offers a more future-proof experience.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A94 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the key differentiator lies in charging speed. The Oppo A94 5G supports 30W wired charging with PD and QC, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Redmi Note 10 5G’s 18W charging. This means the A94 5G can replenish its battery from 0-100% in a shorter timeframe, reducing downtime and offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A94 5G if you need a phone that feels snappier in everyday tasks and benefits from significantly faster charging speeds, minimizing interruptions. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G if you prioritize maximizing battery endurance and are comfortable with slower charging, or if you find it at a substantially lower price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 800U in the Oppo A94 5G get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Dimensity 700?
While both chipsets are 7nm, the Dimensity 800U's higher clock speeds and GPU performance mean it *may* generate slightly more heat under sustained load. However, Oppo's thermal management implementation will play a significant role, and without specific testing data, it's difficult to definitively say if the difference is substantial enough to cause noticeable throttling.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Oppo A94 5G in real-world terms compared to the 18W charging on the Redmi Note 10 5G?
Expect the Oppo A94 5G to charge from 0-100% approximately 30-45 minutes faster than the Redmi Note 10 5G. While exact times vary based on usage, the 30W charging provides a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Are the camera differences between these phones significant for casual users who primarily use social media?
Given the lack of detailed camera specifications, the differences are likely minimal for casual social media users. Both phones will likely produce acceptable results in good lighting conditions. However, users prioritizing low-light photography or detailed image quality may want to seek more detailed camera reviews before making a decision.
