Both the Oppo A94 5G and Realme 8 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G market, but they approach it with slightly different strategies. The Oppo A94 5G prioritizes processing power with the Dimensity 800U, while the Realme 8 5G focuses on a balanced experience with the Dimensity 700 and a comparable battery endurance rating. This comparison dives deep into the nuances to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance in demanding applications and faster charging, the Oppo A94 5G is the better choice. Its Dimensity 800U chipset provides a noticeable edge, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Realme 8 5G remains a strong contender for those seeking a well-rounded experience at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 16 | 2021, April 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 03 | Available. Released 2021, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD, QC | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Supersonic Blue, Supersonic Black |
| Models | CPH2211 | RMX3241 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1413:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 302059 (v8), 361505 (v9)
GeekBench: 1784 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A94 5G
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- 30W fast charging with PD/QC support
- Potentially better camera image processing
- May be slightly more expensive
- No specific display details available
Realme 8 5G
- Excellent battery endurance
- Potentially more affordable price
- Balanced feature set
- Slower processor compared to Oppo A94 5G
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1413:1, suggesting similar visual quality in terms of black levels and color depth. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) are missing. Given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels. Without further data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, the Realme 8 5G's display is likely optimized for power efficiency, potentially contributing to its endurance rating.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. This makes a direct comparison challenging. In this segment, brand reputation suggests Oppo generally invests more in camera software processing. Without concrete sensor specifications, it's reasonable to assume the Oppo A94 5G might offer slightly more refined image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, due to Oppo’s established camera algorithms. The absence of details regarding OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The Oppo A94 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset, with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, offers a clear advantage over the Realme 8 5G’s Dimensity 700 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76). While both utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the higher clock speed of the A76 cores in the A94 5G translates to faster application loading times and smoother performance in graphically intensive tasks. The 7nm process node is shared, minimizing differences in power efficiency, but the A94 5G will likely exhibit less throttling under sustained load. The Realme 8 5G will still handle everyday tasks with ease, but the A94 5G is the better choice for power users.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A94 5G and Realme 8 5G boast an endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage scenarios. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Oppo A94 5G supports 30W wired charging with PD and QC, allowing for a much faster 0-100% charge compared to the Realme 8 5G’s 18W charging. This difference in charging speed is a key differentiator, as it minimizes downtime and provides greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A94 5G if you frequently engage in mobile gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value quicker charging speeds. Buy the Realme 8 5G if you prioritize a balanced feature set, long battery life, and are looking for a more budget-friendly 5G option without sacrificing core functionality.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 800U in the Oppo A94 5G handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Dimensity 800U is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to compromise on graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. Expect playable performance at medium settings, with occasional dips during intense combat scenarios. The Realme 8 5G's Dimensity 700 will require even lower settings for a smooth experience.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Oppo A94 5G with the 30W charger?
While Oppo advertises 30W charging, real-world charging times will vary. Expect a full 0-100% charge in approximately 60-75 minutes, depending on battery temperature and background processes. This is significantly faster than the Realme 8 5G's 18W charging, which will likely take over 2 hours.
❓ Is the camera on either phone good enough for casual social media posting?
Yes, both phones are perfectly adequate for casual social media photography. While detailed camera specs are lacking, both should produce acceptable results in good lighting conditions. The Oppo A94 5G may offer slightly better low-light performance due to Oppo's image processing algorithms.
