The Oppo A94 5G and A16K are both budget-friendly smartphones, but they cater to different needs. The A94 5G offers 5G connectivity and a more powerful processor, while the A16K prioritizes affordability. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to see which one comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A94 5G is the clear winner for most users, offering significantly better performance, a faster charging speed, and 5G connectivity. However, the A16K remains a compelling option for those on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and extended battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 16 | 2021, November 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 03 | Available. Released 2021, November 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD, QC | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Black, Blue |
| Models | CPH2211 | CPH2349 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 550 EUR |
Oppo A94 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 800U)
- AMOLED Display
- Faster Charging (30W)
- Better Camera System
- Higher Price
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life than A16K
Oppo A16K
- More Affordable
- Longer Battery Life (potentially)
- Decent for Basic Tasks
- Slow Processor (Helio G35)
- IPS LCD Display
- Slow Charging (10W)
- Basic Camera System
Display Comparison
The Oppo A94 5G typically features a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and good contrast. The A16K usually has a 6.52-inch IPS LCD display with a standard 60Hz refresh rate, which is generally less vibrant and has lower contrast. The A94 5G's AMOLED display provides a noticeably better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The A94 5G generally boasts a more versatile camera system, often including a 48MP main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. The A16K typically has a simpler dual-camera setup. While both phones can take decent photos in good lighting, the A94 5G offers better image quality, more features, and improved low-light performance.
Performance
The A94 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset and Octa-core CPU provide a substantial performance boost over the A16K's Helio G35. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A94 5G. The A16K can handle basic tasks, but struggles with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer large batteries, but the A16K often has a slight edge in battery life due to its less power-hungry processor. However, the A94 5G's 30W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the A16K's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A94 5G is ideal for users who want a smooth experience for everyday tasks, enjoy gaming, and want to future-proof their device with 5G. The Oppo A16K is best suited for users who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and basic apps, and are extremely budget-conscious.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A94 5G worth the extra money?
Yes, if you value performance, a better display, and 5G connectivity. The A94 5G offers a significantly improved user experience.
❓ Can the Oppo A16K handle social media and browsing?
Yes, the A16K can handle basic tasks like social media and browsing, but it may feel slow at times, especially with multiple apps open.
