Oppo A94 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Detailed 5G Mid-Range Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Oppo A94 5G emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset offers a slight edge in CPU performance, coupled with 30W charging. However, the Moto G 5G Plus boasts comparable battery endurance and a well-tuned display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A94 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 16 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 03 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD, QC | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | CPH2211 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A94 5G
- Faster 30W charging with PD/QC
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 800U
- Slightly more modern chipset architecture
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- Excellent battery endurance (114h)
- Well-established Motorola software experience
- Slower 20W charging
- Potentially lower CPU performance compared to Dimensity 800U
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A94 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Moto G 5G Plus distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, suggesting better outdoor visibility. While the Oppo A94 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, the Moto G 5G Plus’s brightness is a tangible advantage for users who spend significant time outdoors. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device is a notable omission in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit. Image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator, but without sample images or detailed analysis, it’s impossible to determine which phone captures superior photos. The absence of detailed camera specs highlights a common trend in this price segment – focusing on megapixel count over sensor quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A94 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800U, built on a 7nm process, while the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G, also on a 7nm process. The Dimensity 800U’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a slight clock speed advantage over the Snapdragon 765’s 1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver. This translates to potentially snappier performance in CPU-intensive tasks. However, real-world performance will depend on software optimization and thermal management, which aren't specified in the provided data.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A94 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Oppo A94 5G supports 30W wired charging with PD and QC, while the Moto G 5G Plus is limited to 20W. This means the Oppo A94 5G will recharge much faster, a crucial advantage for users who prioritize convenience. While both offer similar longevity, the Oppo’s faster charging provides a more forgiving experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A94 5G if you frequently multitask, enjoy mobile gaming, or value faster charging speeds. Its Dimensity 800U chipset and 30W charging are geared towards power users. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prioritize long battery life, a consistently bright display, and a more established software experience, even if it means slightly slower charging and potentially less peak performance.