Oppo A94 5G vs Google Pixel 5a 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing software experience and consistent camera performance, the Google Pixel 5a 5G is the better choice. However, the Oppo A94 5G offers significantly faster 30W charging and a potentially more powerful processor for demanding tasks, making it ideal for power users on a budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A94 5G | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 16 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 03 | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD, QC | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Mostly Black |
| Models | CPH2211 | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A94 5G
- 30W Fast Charging with PD/QC
- Potentially stronger multi-core CPU performance
- Competitive chipset for the price
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Camera performance likely trails the Pixel 5a 5G
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Excellent camera quality and image processing
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially less raw processing power for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 5a 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 861 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo A94 5G (brightness data unavailable). Both phones offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. While the A94 5G’s panel characteristics are unknown, the Pixel 5a 5G’s brightness advantage is a significant benefit for outdoor use. The lack of high refresh rate on either device is a common trade-off in this price segment.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 5a 5G is expected to excel in camera performance due to Google’s computational photography prowess. While specific sensor details are missing for both devices, the Pixel’s reputation for image processing and dynamic range is a significant advantage. The Oppo A94 5G likely relies more on hardware specifications, but without knowing sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities. The absence of information regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, potentially impacting low-light performance. The Pixel 5a 5G’s strength lies in its consistent, high-quality images across various conditions.
Performance
Both the Oppo A94 5G and Google Pixel 5a 5G utilize 7nm process nodes, but employ different chipsets: the Mediatek Dimensity 800U and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, respectively. The Dimensity 800U features a dual-cluster CPU configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), while the Snapdragon 765G uses a tri-cluster setup (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). While peak clock speeds are similar, the Snapdragon 765G’s Kryo architecture is generally considered more efficient. The A94 5G may exhibit slightly better multi-core performance, but the Pixel 5a 5G’s optimized software and potentially superior thermal management could lead to more sustained performance under load. RAM specifications are not provided, but both likely utilize LPDDR4X to balance performance and power consumption.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A94 5G and Google Pixel 5a 5G achieve an endurance rating of 122 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Oppo A94 5G supports 30W wired charging with PD and QC, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Pixel 5a 5G’s 18W charging with PD2.0. This means the A94 5G can replenish its battery much quicker, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to recharge. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Oppo A94 5G offsets any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A94 5G if you need rapid charging capabilities and prioritize raw processing power for gaming or multitasking. Its 30W charging with PD and QC support will minimize downtime. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you prefer a clean Android experience, exceptional camera quality, and guaranteed software updates, even if it means sacrificing charging speed and potentially some raw performance.