The Oppo A93 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take distinctly different approaches to performance and charging, centered around their respective chipsets. This comparison dissects those differences to reveal which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 750G, built on a more efficient 8nm process, offers better sustained performance and 5G connectivity, while the 33W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Oppo A93’s 18W.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 01. Released 2020, October 01 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | CPH2121, CPH2123 | M2007J17C |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 370 EUR |
Oppo A93
- Potentially smoother experience for basic tasks.
- May be available at a lower price point.
- Sleek design (based on marketing materials).
- Less efficient chipset (12nm vs 8nm).
- Slower 18W charging.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Faster 33W charging.
- More efficient Snapdragon 750G chipset.
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Software experience can be more cluttered (typical of Xiaomi).
- Potentially larger physical size.
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature LCD panels around 6.5 inches. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, being newer, may benefit from slightly improved color calibration. Bezels are expected to be comparable, with neither phone aiming for flagship-level screen-to-body ratios.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, being a 'Pro' model, likely features a larger primary sensor than the A93. The Snapdragon 750G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also generally more capable, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The A93 may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) boasts a clear architectural advantage over the Oppo A93’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The 8nm process inherently provides better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation under load and potentially reduced throttling during extended gaming sessions. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon’s Kryo 570 cores are architecturally more advanced than the Helio P95’s Cortex-A75, offering improved IPC (Instructions Per Clock). This means the Snapdragon 750G will likely deliver superior performance in CPU-intensive tasks and more responsive multitasking.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the charging speeds are a significant differentiator. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s 33W charging can fully charge the device in approximately 58 minutes, a substantial improvement over the Oppo A93’s 18W charging. This faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery throughout the day. The more efficient Snapdragon 750G may also contribute to slightly better battery life, even with a similar capacity battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A93 if you prioritize a potentially smoother experience with everyday tasks and are less concerned with demanding gaming or prolonged 5G usage. Its Helio P95 is adequate for typical smartphone activities. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you value 5G connectivity, faster charging speeds, and a chipset designed for more sustained performance, making it ideal for gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, its Adreno 619 GPU provides sufficient power for a smooth gaming experience, and the 8nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Oppo A93 in real-world usage?
The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s 33W charging can take a phone from 0% to 100% in around 58 minutes. The Oppo A93’s 18W charging will likely take over 2 hours to achieve a full charge. This translates to significantly less downtime for the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, especially for users who need to quickly top up their battery before leaving the house.
❓ Does the Helio P95 in the Oppo A93 struggle with multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously?
The Helio P95 can handle moderate multitasking, but it may exhibit some slowdowns when running a large number of apps concurrently. The Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, with its more efficient architecture and potentially faster RAM, will provide a smoother multitasking experience.
