The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A93 and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC represent compelling options. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches. The A93 prioritizes a stylish design, while the Poco X3 NFC focuses on raw performance and fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing gaming and quick top-ups, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset and 33W fast charging significantly outperform the Oppo A93’s Helio P95 and 18W charging. However, the A93 remains a viable option for those valuing aesthetics and a slightly lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 01. Released 2020, October 01 | 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 62% in 30 min, 100% in 65 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Cobalt Blue, Shadow Gray |
| Models | CPH2121, CPH2123 | M2007J20CG, M2007J20CT |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | € 259.00 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 2,800,000 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | € 229.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 119.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1299:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 283750 (v8)
GeekBench: 1777 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A93
- Sleek and stylish design
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery endurance
- Inferior chipset performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Limited gaming capabilities
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
- Superior Snapdragon 732G performance
- Ultra-fast 33W charging
- Likely better gaming experience
- Potentially less refined design
- May be slightly more expensive
- No detailed display specs provided
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A93 and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC feature displays with a nominal contrast ratio of 1299:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing for the A93. The Poco X3 NFC’s 120Hz refresh rate, while not explicitly stated in the provided data, is a key advantage for smoother scrolling and gaming, a feature likely absent on the A93. Bezels are also likely to be slimmer on the Poco X3 NFC, contributing to a more immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Poco X3 NFC’s focus on overall performance, it’s reasonable to assume Xiaomi invested more in its camera system. The A93 likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility for serious photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm) is architecturally superior to the Oppo A93’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 732G translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, meaning sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 732G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores, clocked at 2.3 GHz, also offer a performance edge over the Helio P95’s 2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This difference is particularly noticeable in gaming and graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 NFC boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 62% in 30 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes. The Oppo A93’s 18W charging is considerably slower. Both devices have an endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting comparable battery life *despite* the charging speed difference. This implies the Poco X3 NFC’s more efficient chipset and potentially larger battery capacity (not specified) offset the faster charging’s power draw.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A93 if you need a phone with a more refined aesthetic and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light photography. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC if you prefer a device optimized for gaming, demanding multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging – especially if you’re a heavy user.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 NFC’s Snapdragon 732G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 732G is specifically designed for gaming. It can comfortably handle PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates, especially considering the likely presence of a 120Hz display for smoother visuals. The Helio P95 in the Oppo A93 will struggle to maintain consistent performance at the same settings.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Poco X3 NFC compared to the 18W charging on the Oppo A93 in real-world use?
The 33W charging on the Poco X3 NFC is substantially faster. It can reach 100% charge in approximately 65 minutes, while the Oppo A93 will likely take well over 2 hours. This difference is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery during short breaks.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Snapdragon 732G and Helio P95 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both chipsets can handle everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 732G provides a smoother and more responsive experience. App loading times will be faster, multitasking will be more fluid, and the overall user interface will feel snappier. The Helio P95 may exhibit occasional lag or stuttering during heavy multitasking.
