The Oppo A93, while a capable device in its time, now faces a formidable challenger in the OnePlus Nord 5. This comparison isn't about incremental upgrades; it's about a significant shift in processing power, display technology, and charging speed. We'll dissect the key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the OnePlus Nord 5 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset offers dramatically faster performance, coupled with an exceptionally bright display and incredibly rapid 80W charging. The Oppo A93 remains a budget-friendly option, but it's significantly outmatched.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 01. Released 2020, October 01 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, July 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Swift AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 100% in just 54 min
5W reverse wired
Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Europe)· 6800 mAh (Global) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Phantom Grey, Dry Ice, Marble Sands |
| Models | CPH2121, CPH2123 | CPH2709 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | £ 339.00 / € 294.97 / ₹ 31,998 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | - | 49:12h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo A93
- Extremely affordable price point
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Decent battery life for light usage
- Outdated Helio P95 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely inferior display quality
OnePlus Nord 5
- Powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Bright and vibrant display (1330 nits)
- Excellent battery endurance (49:12h)
- Higher price compared to the Oppo A93
- May be overkill for basic users
- No expandable storage (assumed)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 5 boasts a significantly superior display experience. Its peak brightness of 1330 nits (measured) dwarfs the Oppo A93’s likely lower peak brightness (spec not provided, but typical of the segment). This translates to excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the A93’s panel type isn’t specified, the Nord 5’s likely utilizes a more advanced technology, offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of refresh rate data for the A93 further highlights the Nord 5’s potential advantage, as higher refresh rates contribute to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests a significant advantage for the Nord 5. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 includes a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) capable of faster image processing and better noise reduction. While the A93 may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, the Nord 5 is expected to excel in low-light scenarios and offer more advanced features like improved HDR and video stabilization. We can assume the Nord 5 will have a more sophisticated camera system overall.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The OnePlus Nord 5’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) is built on a far more efficient process node than the Oppo A93’s Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12nm). This 4nm process allows for greater transistor density and reduced heat generation, resulting in sustained performance. The Nord 5’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X4 prime core alongside A720 and A520 cores – is architecturally superior to the A93’s Cortex-A75 and A55 setup, delivering faster single-core and multi-core performance. The Nord 5 will handle demanding games and applications with ease, while the A93 will likely struggle with more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 5’s battery performance is a standout feature. Its 49:12h endurance and 13:47h active use score demonstrate exceptional longevity. Crucially, the 80W wired charging capability – alongside 33W PPS and 18W PD support – allows for a full charge in just 54 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who value convenience. The Oppo A93’s 18W charging is comparatively slow, requiring significantly longer to reach a full charge. While the A93’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Nord 5’s efficient chipset and fast charging mitigate the need for a larger battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A93 if you prioritize extreme budget-friendliness and only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the OnePlus Nord 5 if you demand smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, a vibrant display, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging – a true modern smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the OnePlus Nord 5 handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a powerful chipset capable of running Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive games at high settings with smooth frame rates. Its advanced cooling system should also prevent significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How long will it realistically take to fully charge the OnePlus Nord 5 from 0%?
OnePlus claims a full charge in just 54 minutes with the 80W charger. Real-world testing confirms this is accurate, making it exceptionally convenient for users who need a quick power boost. The Nord 5 also supports 33W PPS and 18W PD charging for compatibility with other chargers, though at slower speeds.
❓ Is the Oppo A93 still a viable option for everyday use like browsing and social media?
Yes, the Oppo A93 is perfectly adequate for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and making calls. However, you'll notice slower app loading times and less responsiveness compared to the OnePlus Nord 5, especially when multitasking.
❓ Does the OnePlus Nord 5 support wireless charging?
Unfortunately, the OnePlus Nord 5 does not support wireless charging. While it excels in wired charging speed, the absence of wireless charging may be a drawback for some users.
