The Oppo A93 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving it. The A93 leans on MediaTek’s Helio P95, while the Moto G9 Plus opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 730G. This comparison dissects these choices, revealing which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 730G, built on an 8nm process, offers superior efficiency and gaming capabilities compared to the Oppo A93’s 12nm Helio P95. While both boast similar battery endurance ratings, the G9 Plus’s 30W charging significantly reduces downtime.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 01. Released 2020, October 01 | 2020, September 07. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 170 x 78.1 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (standard) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Rose Gold, Indigo Blue |
| Models | CPH2121, CPH2123 | XT2087-1 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 136h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1356:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 253105 (v8)
GeekBench: 1695 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A93
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery endurance
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Less efficient Helio P95 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely inferior gaming performance
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
- More efficient Snapdragon 730G chipset
- Faster 30W charging
- Better sustained performance
- Higher peak display brightness
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to A93
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A93 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus share a contrast ratio of 1356:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Moto G9 Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 522 nits, which will translate to better outdoor visibility compared to the A93, whose brightness is not specified. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the G9 Plus’s higher brightness provides a tangible advantage in real-world usage, especially under direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 730G’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more advanced than the Helio P95’s, potentially leading to better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance on the Moto G9 Plus. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer, likely targeting average image quality for social media sharing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s Snapdragon 730G (8nm) is architecturally superior to the Oppo A93’s Helio P95 (12nm). The 8nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, meaning the G9 Plus will generate less heat under load and experience less performance throttling during prolonged gaming or intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 730G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, are also more efficient than the Helio P95’s Cortex-A75 cores at the same clock speed. This translates to a smoother user experience and better sustained performance for the Moto G9 Plus.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 136 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s 30W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Oppo A93’s 18W charging. This means the G9 Plus can replenish its battery much faster, reducing downtime and offering greater convenience. While both may last a full day, the G9 Plus’s charging speed provides a practical benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A93 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are a casual user who doesn’t heavily rely on demanding applications or extended gaming sessions. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Plus if you value smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and the convenience of significantly faster 30W charging, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 730G in the Moto G9 Plus handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 730G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. Its Adreno 618 GPU provides a significant performance boost over the Helio P95’s GPU, resulting in a smoother gaming experience with less stuttering.
❓ How long does it actually take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G9 Plus with the 30W charger?
While Motorola doesn't provide an exact figure, testing indicates the Moto G9 Plus can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 65-75 minutes with the included 30W charger. This is considerably faster than the Oppo A93’s 18W charging, which would likely take over 2 hours for a full charge.
❓ Is the difference in chipset efficiency between the Helio P95 and Snapdragon 730G noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is noticeable, particularly during prolonged use. The Snapdragon 730G’s 8nm process generates less heat, meaning the Moto G9 Plus will maintain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The A93’s Helio P95, on the 12nm process, is more prone to throttling under sustained load, leading to occasional slowdowns.
