The Oppo A93 and Huawei P smart 2021 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware. This comparison dissects these differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and charging capabilities to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and smoother multitasking, the Oppo A93 emerges as the better choice. Its Helio P95 chipset, featuring Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Kirin 710A in the Huawei P smart 2021, despite the latter's slightly faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 01. Released 2020, October 01 | 2020, September 28. Released 2020, September 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 165.7 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) | Kirin 710A (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, built-in antenna |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 22.5W wired, 46% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Metallic White | Crush Green, Blush Gold, Midnight Black |
| Models | CPH2121, CPH2123 | PPA-LX1, PPA-LX2 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1252:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.8 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 169253 (v8)
GeekBench: 1334 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A93
- More powerful processor for smoother performance
- Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A75)
- Potentially better thermal management due to 12nm process
- Battery capacity and endurance are unknown
- Charging speed is slower than the Huawei P smart 2021
Huawei P smart 2021
- Exceptional battery life (119h endurance)
- Faster 22.5W charging with 46% in 30 minutes
- Good display brightness (442 nits)
- Less powerful processor (Kirin 710A)
- Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A73)
Display Comparison
The Huawei P smart 2021 boasts a measured peak brightness of 442 nits and a 1252:1 contrast ratio, indicating a reasonably viewable display. However, the Oppo A93’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. Given the market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The contrast ratio is identical, suggesting similar black levels. Without knowing the Oppo A93’s brightness, the Huawei P smart 2021 has a slight edge in outdoor visibility based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without specific sensor details or megapixel counts, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both feature a primary camera and potentially an ultrawide or depth sensor, common in this price range. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes camera performance as a key selling point. We can infer that image processing will likely be geared towards social media sharing rather than professional photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A93’s Mediatek Helio P95 (12nm) utilizes a more modern CPU architecture with two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This contrasts with the Huawei P smart 2021’s Kirin 710A (14nm), which features four Cortex-A73 cores at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.7 GHz. The A75 cores in the Helio P95 offer a significant architectural advantage over the A73 cores, translating to faster single-core and multi-core performance. The 12nm process node of the Helio P95 is also more efficient than the 14nm node of the Kirin 710A, potentially leading to better thermal management under sustained load. This means the Oppo A93 is likely to maintain higher performance for longer periods during gaming or video editing.
Battery Life
The Huawei P smart 2021 shines with an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Oppo A93’s battery capacity is unknown, the Huawei’s endurance suggests a well-optimized system. However, the Oppo A93 compensates with 18W wired charging, while the Huawei P smart 2021 offers faster 22.5W charging, achieving 46% charge in just 30 minutes. This faster charging speed mitigates the potential disadvantage of a slightly smaller battery, allowing for quicker top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A93 if you frequently switch between apps, enjoy mobile gaming, or need a phone that feels consistently snappy. Its more powerful processor will handle demanding tasks with greater ease. Buy the Huawei P smart 2021 if battery endurance is your absolute top priority and you primarily use your phone for basic communication and light social media. The 119-hour endurance rating is impressive, and the 22.5W charging offers a quick top-up when needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Kirin 710A in the Huawei P smart 2021 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Kirin 710A is a capable chip for casual gaming, but it may exhibit frame drops or require lower graphics settings in demanding titles like PUBG Mobile. The Oppo A93’s Helio P95, with its more powerful CPU and GPU, will provide a smoother gaming experience overall.
❓ How much faster is the 22.5W charging on the Huawei P smart 2021 compared to the Oppo A93’s 18W charging?
The Huawei P smart 2021 can achieve a 46% charge in 30 minutes with its 22.5W charging. While the Oppo A93’s 18W charging is still respectable, it will take considerably longer to reach a similar charge level. This makes the Huawei P smart 2021 a better choice for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the lack of information about the Oppo A93's battery capacity suggest it's significantly smaller than the Huawei P smart 2021's?
Not necessarily. Manufacturers sometimes omit battery capacity details when focusing on other features. However, given the Huawei P smart 2021’s exceptional endurance rating, it’s likely the Oppo A93 has a smaller battery capacity, relying on the more efficient Helio P95 chipset to compensate.
