Both the Oppo A93 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G target the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G market. However, they approach this segment with different philosophies. The A93 5G prioritizes affordability with a Snapdragon 480, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G steps up with a more powerful Snapdragon 695 and a focus on rapid charging. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance boost over the A93 5G’s Snapdragon 480, and the inclusion of 67W charging – capable of a full charge in just 42 minutes – is a game-changer. While both offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s charging speed provides a significant convenience advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 14 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 20 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 74.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | PCGM00, PEHM00, PEHT00 | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A93 5G
- Lower upfront cost
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Slower Snapdragon 480 processor
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely less vibrant display
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Brighter display (746 nits)
- Higher price point
- May not offer significantly longer battery life despite faster charging
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits. This is a substantial improvement over what we’d expect from the A93 5G, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for LCD/OLED panels), the higher brightness of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G translates to a more visually engaging experience. Details regarding panel technology (LCD vs AMOLED) and refresh rates are missing for the A93 5G, suggesting a more basic display experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having photo/video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system. The A93 5G, being a more budget-oriented device, likely features a simpler camera setup. We can assume the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G will offer better low-light performance and more versatile shooting modes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm process, represents a clear upgrade over the A93 5G’s 8nm Snapdragon 480. The 695 features Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores clocked up to 2.2 GHz, compared to the 480’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements and higher clock speeds of the 695 provide a tangible benefit. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely to handle demanding applications and games with greater ease.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the differences in chipset efficiency. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging is a massive advantage. It can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes, while the A93 5G is limited to a slower 18W charging speed. This difference in charging speed significantly impacts usability, allowing the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G to quickly top up its battery when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A93 5G if your primary concern is minimizing upfront cost and you only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prioritize smoother performance for multitasking and gaming, demand significantly faster charging speeds, and appreciate a brighter, more vibrant display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable mid-range processor. While it won't deliver the highest frame rates at maximum settings, it should be able to run Genshin Impact at medium settings with acceptable performance. The A93 5G’s Snapdragon 480 would likely struggle with this title.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Oppo A93 5G in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G can go from 0% to 50% in just 15 minutes and fully charge in 42 minutes. The Oppo A93 5G will take significantly longer – likely over 90 minutes for a full charge – making the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G much more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G support Power Delivery (PD) charging with a compatible charger?
Yes, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports PD3.0, allowing for faster charging with compatible chargers and cables. This provides flexibility beyond the included charger.
