The Oppo A93 5G and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both offer 5G connectivity, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, creating a clear distinction in performance and target audience. This comparison dissects these differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset delivers substantially higher performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding tasks. While the Oppo A93 5G offers 5G at a lower price point, the Poco X3 Pro’s power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 14 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 20 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 74.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | PCGM00, PEHM00, PEHT00 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 260 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A93 5G
- More affordable 5G option
- Sleek design (assumed, based on brand aesthetic)
- Decent battery endurance
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slower charging speed
- Limited gaming performance
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 processor
- Fast 33W charging
- Excellent gaming performance
- Slightly higher price point
- May run warmer under heavy load
- Design may be less premium (subjective)
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing for the Oppo A93 5G. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond the contrast ratio, benefits from the overall processing power to drive smoother visuals. Without knowing the Oppo’s panel technology, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but the Poco X3 Pro’s chipset provides headroom for advanced display features.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s superior processing power, it’s likely to offer more advanced image processing capabilities, such as better low-light performance and faster image capture. The Oppo A93 5G’s camera is likely to be more limited by its less powerful chipset.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A93 5G’s Snapdragon 480 (8nm). The 860 features a Kryo 485 core configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the 480’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience. The 7nm process node of the 860 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Oppo A93 5G is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging (59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min) is significantly faster than the Oppo A93 5G’s 18W charging. This faster charging speed is a major convenience factor, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. While both have similar endurance, the Poco X3 Pro’s charging speed provides a practical advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A93 5G if your primary need is affordable 5G connectivity and you prioritize a sleek design over raw processing power. It’s a good fit for casual users who primarily browse, stream, and use social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you’re a gamer, power user, or anyone who demands a responsive and capable smartphone experience. The Snapdragon 860 provides a significant performance boost for demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 860 is a powerful chip, it's known for being relatively efficient. The Poco X3 Pro incorporates thermal management solutions, but sustained gaming at maximum settings may lead to some heat buildup. However, it's unlikely to experience significant throttling compared to less powerful chips.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Oppo A93 5G slow compared to other phones in this price range?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 33W charging found on the Poco X3 Pro and many other phones in the same price bracket. Expect longer charging times, potentially taking over two hours for a full charge from empty.
❓ Can the Oppo A93 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Oppo A93 5G’s Snapdragon 480 is not ideally suited for demanding games. You may be able to run these games at lower graphics settings, but expect frame drops and a less-than-optimal gaming experience. The Poco X3 Pro is a much better choice for mobile gaming.
