Oppo A93 5G vs OnePlus Nord 2 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, complemented by blazing-fast 65W charging. While the Oppo A93 5G offers 5G connectivity at a lower price point, the Nord 2’s overall experience is substantially more refined.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A93 5G | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 14 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 20 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 74.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | PCGM00, PEHM00, PEHT00 | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A93 5G
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Significantly weaker performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Limited camera details
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Brighter display
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- No expandable storage (likely)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 633 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A93 5G. While both are likely LCD panels given the price points, the Nord 2’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The Nord 2’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a standard LCD contrast ratio, while the A93 5G’s display specs are currently unavailable. The lack of detailed display information for the A93 5G suggests it’s a cost-saving area.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information for either phone, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Nord 2 5G’s positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system. The A93 5G likely relies on a more basic camera setup to keep costs down. The absence of details on image stabilization (OIS) for the A93 5G further suggests a less advanced camera experience. Users serious about mobile photography should lean towards the Nord 2 5G, anticipating better image quality and features.
Performance
The performance gap between these phones is substantial. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) features a powerful octa-core CPU configuration – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – designed for demanding applications. In contrast, the Oppo A93 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) utilizes a more modest octa-core setup (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460). The Dimensity 1200’s 6nm process node is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance during prolonged gaming or video editing. Users prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking will find the Nord 2 5G a far superior experience.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 102 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Oppo A93 5G is limited to 18W wired charging, while the OnePlus Nord 2 5G supports 65W wired charging with PD, achieving a full charge in just 30 minutes. This difference is significant; the Nord 2 5G’s rapid charging minimizes downtime and offers a much more convenient user experience. While both may last a similar amount of time on a single charge, the Nord 2 5G’s charging speed is a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A93 5G if you need a very affordable 5G phone and prioritize basic functionality over demanding tasks. It’s a good option for users primarily focused on calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you value performance for gaming, multitasking, and photography, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging. It’s ideal for users who want a smooth, responsive experience and don’t want to compromise on key features.