The Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom and Oppo A92s represent compelling options in the mid-range 5G smartphone space, but cater to different priorities. The K30 Pro Zoom, leveraging Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 865, aims for near-flagship performance, while the A92s utilizes MediaTek’s Dimensity 800, focusing on a balance of power and efficiency. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers a significantly more powerful experience, complemented by 33W fast charging. However, the Oppo A92s remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget seeking a capable 5G device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, March 24. Released 2020, April 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 163.3 x 75.4 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
13 MP, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, PD, QC4, 100% in 63 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Pink | Grey, Purple, White, Blue |
| Models | PDKM00 | - |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Oppo A92s
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 5G connectivity
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 865
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 865)
- Faster charging (33W with PD/QC4)
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
While specific display details (resolution, refresh rate) are absent, the core difference lies in the processing power driving the visuals. The Snapdragon 865’s Adreno 650 GPU in the K30 Pro Zoom will handle graphically intensive games and video playback with greater ease. The A92s, powered by the Dimensity 800’s Mali-G52 MC4, will provide a satisfactory experience for most users, but may exhibit frame drops in demanding scenarios. The K30 Pro Zoom’s superior processing capability translates to a smoother, more vibrant visual experience, especially during gaming.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the K30 Pro Zoom’s positioning as a more premium device, it likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) also offers advanced features like improved low-light performance and faster image processing. The A92s will likely offer a competent camera experience, but the K30 Pro Zoom is expected to deliver superior image quality and versatility.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) significantly outperforms the Oppo A92s’ Dimensity 800 (7nm). The Snapdragon 865 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core versus the A92s’ 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores – resulting in faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The K30 Pro Zoom’s architecture also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations for gaming and AI tasks. While the Dimensity 800 is a capable chip, it simply cannot match the raw processing power of the Snapdragon 865, impacting performance in demanding applications and games.
Battery Life
The Redmi K30 Pro Zoom’s 33W wired charging with support for Power Delivery (PD) and Quick Charge 4 (QC4) is a significant advantage. Achieving a 100% charge in just 63 minutes is considerably faster than the Oppo A92s’ 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the K30 Pro Zoom mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. This means less downtime and more time using the device, particularly beneficial for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A92s if you need a reliable 5G smartphone with decent performance for everyday tasks and value affordability above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 800 in the Oppo A92s struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 800 can run Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 865 in the K30 Pro Zoom will provide a much smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Redmi K30 Pro Zoom compared to the 18W charging on the Oppo A92s in real-world use?
The Redmi K30 Pro Zoom can charge from 0-100% in approximately 63 minutes. The Oppo A92s, with its 18W charging, will likely take over 2 hours to achieve a full charge, making the K30 Pro Zoom significantly more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 865 in the K30 Pro Zoom generate significantly more heat than the Dimensity 800 during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 865 is more powerful, Qualcomm has implemented thermal management features to mitigate heat generation. The K30 Pro Zoom likely has a more robust cooling system than the A92s, preventing significant throttling even during extended gaming. However, both phones may experience some degree of warming.
