The Oppo A92s and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver 5G connectivity without the flagship price tag, but they achieve this with different approaches to chipset selection and feature prioritization. This comparison dissects the core differences between the Mediatek Dimensity 800-powered A92s and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G-equipped A71 5G UW, helping you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a more established brand ecosystem, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is the better choice. However, the Oppo A92s offers competitive CPU performance thanks to its Dimensity 800 chipset, making it a strong contender for users focused on processing power and potentially lower cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 260, 261 SA/NSA/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, July 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, July 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 162.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, One UI 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Pink | Prism Bricks Black |
| Models | PDKM00 | SM-A716V |
| Price | About 290 EUR | - |
| SAR | - | 0.50 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A92s
- Strong multi-core CPU performance with Dimensity 800
- Potentially lower price point
- 7nm fabrication for good efficiency
- Slower 18W charging
- Less established brand recognition
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G offers balanced performance
- More established brand and wider carrier compatibility
- Slightly less raw CPU power compared to Dimensity 800
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, both likely utilize IPS LCD technology common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on display quality, but rather on the underlying processing power to drive the UI smoothly. Bezels are expected to be similar, typical of mid-range phones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups geared towards versatility. However, the image signal processor (ISP) within each chipset plays a crucial role. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon ISPs are generally known for strong image processing and video stabilization. Mediatek has improved its ISP capabilities in recent generations, but Qualcomm maintains an edge in this area. The absence of information on sensor sizes and lens apertures makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Snapdragon 765G likely offers a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A92s utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture prioritizes strong multi-core performance, beneficial for tasks like video editing or running multiple apps simultaneously. Conversely, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW employs the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7nm), with a tri-cluster setup: 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver. The Snapdragon 765G’s architecture is designed for a balance of performance and efficiency, with the Prime core handling peak tasks. While the Snapdragon 765G has a higher clocked prime core, the Dimensity 800’s Cortex-A76 cores are generally considered more efficient and competitive in sustained workloads. Both utilize 7nm fabrication, suggesting similar thermal characteristics, though the Snapdragon’s architecture may offer slightly better sustained performance under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW gains a clear advantage with its 25W wired charging capability, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Oppo A92s’ 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed will translate to less downtime. The difference in charging wattage will be noticeable in daily use, especially for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The efficiency of the respective chipsets will also play a role in overall battery life, but the charging speed is the more significant differentiator here.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A92s if you need a phone with strong multi-core CPU performance for demanding apps and multitasking, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW if you prefer a faster charging experience, a more recognizable brand, and a potentially wider carrier compatibility, even if it means slightly less raw CPU horsepower.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 800 in the Oppo A92s struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Dimensity 800 is capable of running most popular games, but you may need to adjust graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. While it doesn't match flagship-level performance, it's more than adequate for casual and moderate gaming. The Snapdragon 765G in the A71 5G UW will likely offer slightly more consistent performance in demanding titles.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
The Snapdragon 765G modem supports carrier aggregation, which allows the phone to combine multiple 5G channels for increased data speeds. This is a significant advantage in areas with strong 5G coverage. The Oppo A92s’ 5G capabilities are dependent on the specific modem used with the Dimensity 800, and carrier aggregation support may vary by region.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Oppo A92s and the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW?
Samsung's One UI is a mature and feature-rich software experience, known for its customization options and polish. Oppo's ColorOS, while improving, is often perceived as more heavily customized and potentially containing more pre-installed bloatware. Samsung also typically offers longer software support with more frequent updates.
