Oppo A92s vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range and Flagship 5G Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Realme X50 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset offers a significant performance leap over the A92s' Dimensity 800, and the 65W charging is a game-changer. However, the A92s remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A92s | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Pink | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | PDKM00 | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A92s
- More affordable price point
- Decent 5G connectivity
- Acceptable battery life
- Significantly slower processor
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely lower display quality
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 865 performance
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load
- May be larger and heavier than the A92s
Display Comparison
The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a noticeably brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to the Oppo A92s (brightness data unavailable, but likely lower given its price point). While both are likely to utilize IPS LCD panels, the X50 Pro’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The X50 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a well-tuned panel, though without specific contrast measurements, it’s difficult to quantify the difference. The A92s’ display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more standard experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the X50 Pro, being a flagship, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and better image processing algorithms. The A92s likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience for casual users, while the X50 Pro aims for higher image quality and versatility. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the X50 Pro would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a flagship processor built on a more advanced process node than the Oppo A92s’ Dimensity 800 (7nm). The Snapdragon 865 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 performance cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – versus the A92s’ 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to significantly faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the X50 Pro. The Snapdragon 865 also benefits from a more capable Adreno GPU, further widening the performance gap.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the X50 Pro’s more powerful processor. This is likely due to optimizations in software and battery management. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Oppo A92s is limited to 18W wired charging, while the Realme X50 Pro 5G supports blazing-fast 65W wired charging with PD (Power Delivery), achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor for the X50 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A92s if you need a reliable 5G phone for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize affordability. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you demand top-tier performance for demanding games, video editing, or multitasking, and value incredibly fast charging speeds and a brighter display.