OnePlus Nord 5 vs Oppo A92s: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 5 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and improved efficiency, complemented by blazing-fast 80W charging and a brighter display. While the Oppo A92s remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers, the Nord 5’s advancements justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A92s | OnePlus Nord 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 29 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, July 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Swift AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 100% in just 54 min 5W reverse wired Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Europe)· 6800 mAh (Global) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Pink | Phantom Grey, Dry Ice, Marble Sands |
| Models | PDKM00 | CPH2709 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | £ 339.00 / € 294.97 / ₹ 31,998 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 49:12h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo A92s
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 800 chipset
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful processor compared to the Nord 5
- Likely lower display brightness and refresh rate
OnePlus Nord 5
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor
- Bright and vibrant display (1330 nits)
- Excellent battery endurance (49:12h)
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potential for increased heat under heavy load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1330 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A92s. This higher peak brightness translates to improved visibility in direct sunlight. While the A92s’ panel technology isn’t specified, the Nord 5’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability. The absence of refresh rate data for the A92s suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the Nord 5 is expected to offer a smoother experience with a higher refresh rate (likely 120Hz, based on market trends).
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Nord 5 will likely feature a more advanced camera system. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is significantly more capable than the Dimensity 800’s, enabling better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While the A92s may offer a usable camera for casual photography, the Nord 5 is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume the Nord 5 will have a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 5’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance and efficiency over the Oppo A92s’ Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7nm). The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside Cortex-A720 and A520 cores, offering a significant advantage in both single-core and multi-core performance compared to the A92s’ Cortex-A76 and A55 cores. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The A92s will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Nord 5 is demonstrably more capable for demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 5 excels in charging speed, supporting 80W wired charging, 33W PPS, and 18W PD, achieving a full charge in just 54 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Oppo A92s’ 18W wired charging. While the Nord 5’s battery capacity isn’t explicitly stated, its endurance rating of 49:12h and active use score of 13:47h indicate excellent battery life. The A92s’ battery capacity is unknown, but its slower charging speed suggests it will take considerably longer to replenish. The Nord 5 also offers 5W reverse wired charging and bypass charging, features absent in the A92s.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A92s if you prioritize affordability and basic smartphone functionality. It’s a solid choice for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Buy the OnePlus Nord 5 if you demand a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for demanding applications like gaming or video editing, and value rapid charging and a vibrant display. The Nord 5 is geared towards power users.