The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and Oppo A92 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Poco X3 Pro aggressively targets gamers with a flagship-level processor, while the Oppo A92 prioritizes a balanced feature set for everyday use. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding performance, the Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 860 chipset and 33W fast charging. However, the Oppo A92 remains a viable option for those seeking a reliable, everyday phone with a more conservative price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Southeast Asia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 04. Released 2020, May 09 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens
2 MP B/W, f/2.4 | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White, Aurora Purple | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | CPH2059 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A92
- More affordable price point
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slower charging speed
- Likely inferior gaming performance
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 processor
- Fast 33W charging
- Superior gaming performance
- Potentially higher price
- May experience thermal throttling under heavy load
- More focused on performance than all-around features
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing for the Oppo A92. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond the contrast ratio, benefits from the processing power of the Snapdragon 860 to render games and videos smoothly. Without knowing the Oppo A92’s panel technology, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the Poco X3 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s focus on overall performance, it’s reasonable to assume its image signal processor (ISP) benefits from the more powerful Snapdragon 860, potentially leading to better image quality and faster processing. The Oppo A92 likely relies on software optimization to compensate for its less powerful chipset.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A92’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 860 features a 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold core, alongside three additional Kryo 485 Gold cores clocked at 2.42 GHz, and four Kryo 485 Silver cores at 1.78 GHz, offering significantly higher processing power than the A92’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver configuration. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience on the Poco X3 Pro. The 7nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, though the 860 is still a powerful chip that can generate heat under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging is a major advantage, achieving 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes. The Oppo A92’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring more time to reach a full charge. This faster charging capability makes the Poco X3 Pro more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A92 if you need a dependable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing, and value a balanced experience over raw power. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize mobile gaming, demanding applications, and faster charging speeds, and are willing to accept potentially higher thermal output during intensive use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is a powerful chip and can generate heat under sustained load. While the 7nm process helps with efficiency, expect some warming, and potentially some thermal throttling, during prolonged gaming. Using a game booster app and ensuring adequate ventilation can help mitigate this.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Oppo A92 slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Compared to the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W charging, 18W is significantly slower. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery, the Oppo A92’s charging speed could be frustrating. However, for overnight charging or less frequent top-ups, it may be sufficient.
❓ Can the Oppo A92 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Oppo A92’s Snapdragon 665 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates compared to the Poco X3 Pro. Expect some stuttering or lag during intense moments, especially on higher settings.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
While the Poco X3 Pro's display specifications aren't fully detailed in the provided data, it is known to support a 120Hz refresh rate. This, combined with the Snapdragon 860, allows for smoother and more responsive gaming experiences in supported titles.
