The Oppo A92 and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A92, powered by the Snapdragon 665, aims for affordability, while the A52s 5G, with its Snapdragon 778G, prioritizes performance and 5G connectivity. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Oppo A92’s Snapdragon 665, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a better gaming experience. While both offer similar battery endurance, the A52s 5G’s faster 25W charging is a significant convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Southeast Asia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 04. Released 2020, May 09 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens
2 MP B/W, f/2.4 | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White, Aurora Purple | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | CPH2059 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 250 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A92
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Lightweight design (likely, based on market positioning)
- Significantly slower performance
- Less capable camera system
- Slower charging speed
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Much faster performance with Snapdragon 778G
- Brighter and potentially more accurate display
- Faster 25W charging
- 5G connectivity
- Higher price compared to Oppo A92
- Potentially slightly heavier (depending on build materials)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 800 nits, compared to the Oppo A92’s unspecified brightness. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the A52s 5G’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. The A92’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a lower-tier panel. The A52s 5G’s panel is likely to offer better color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison. However, the Snapdragon 778G’s image signal processor (ISP) in the A52s 5G is significantly more advanced than the ISP in the Snapdragon 665, enabling better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. The A52s 5G is likely to produce superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A92’s camera system is likely geared towards basic photography needs.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A92’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm) is an entry-level processor, while the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a mid-range powerhouse. The 778G’s Cortex-A78 prime core, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offers a substantial performance increase over the A92’s Kryo 260 Gold cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm manufacturing process of the 778G also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This means the A52s 5G will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers significantly faster 25W wired charging, allowing for a quicker top-up compared to the Oppo A92’s 18W charging. This faster charging speed is a practical advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery throughout the day. While the mAh capacity isn't specified, the more efficient Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G likely contributes to the similar endurance rating despite potentially having a smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A92 if your primary needs are basic smartphone functionality – calls, texts, social media – and you’re on a very tight budget. It’s a suitable option for users who prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you want a phone that can handle demanding apps, games, and 5G connectivity without compromise. It’s ideal for users who value performance, a brighter display, and faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G capable of handling demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a very capable chipset for mobile gaming. It can comfortably run Genshin Impact and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps to minimize thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G supports carrier aggregation, which allows the phone to combine multiple 5G channels for significantly faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a key advantage for users in areas with strong 5G coverage.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Oppo A92 with the 18W charger?
Based on the 18W charging speed and typical battery capacities in this segment, a full charge from 0% to 100% on the Oppo A92 will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. This is considerably slower than the A52s 5G’s 25W charging.
❓ Is the camera on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G good for low-light photography?
The A52s 5G’s camera, powered by the Snapdragon 778G’s ISP, performs well in low-light conditions. It utilizes advanced noise reduction algorithms and image processing techniques to capture brighter and more detailed photos in dimly lit environments, surpassing the expected performance of the A92.
