The Oppo A92 and Realme 8 Pro represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The A92, powered by the Snapdragon 665, aims for affordability and efficiency, while the Realme 8 Pro, with its Snapdragon 720G and 50W charging, targets users prioritizing performance and convenience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 8 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 720G offers a noticeable performance uplift over the A92’s Snapdragon 665, and the inclusion of 50W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While both phones boast similar battery endurance ratings, the faster charging of the Realme 8 Pro provides a more practical advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Southeast Asia | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 04. Released 2020, May 09 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens
2 MP B/W, f/2.4 | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White, Aurora Purple | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | CPH2059 | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A92
- More affordable price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Slower Snapdragon 665 processor
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely inferior camera performance
Realme 8 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 720G processor
- Ultra-fast 50W charging
- Potentially better camera performance
- Slightly higher price
- Similar battery endurance to A92, but charging is the key benefit
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A92 and Realme 8 Pro share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Realme 8 Pro’s positioning, it’s likely to have a slightly more vibrant display, but without concrete data, this remains speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery efficiency over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are scarce. The Realme 8 Pro likely benefits from the more powerful ISP within the Snapdragon 720G, enabling better image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme 8 Pro’s chipset suggests superior low-light performance and video stabilization. The presence of a 50W charging capability implies a focus on content creation, suggesting Realme anticipates users will be capturing more photos and videos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G, built on an 8nm process, represents a significant architectural improvement over the Oppo A92’s 11nm Snapdragon 665. The 720G’s Kryo 465 cores (2x2.3 GHz Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Silver) offer higher clock speeds and improved efficiency compared to the A92’s Kryo 260 cores (4x2.0 GHz Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Silver). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Realme 8 Pro. While both likely feature similar RAM configurations, the 720G’s GPU will provide a substantial graphics performance advantage.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones share an endurance rating of 116 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the differing chipsets. However, the Realme 8 Pro’s 50W wired charging is a game-changer. Achieving 50% charge in just 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the Oppo A92’s slower 18W charging. This makes the Realme 8 Pro far more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A92 if you prioritize extreme affordability and a simple, reliable experience for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and if you want the convenience of incredibly fast 50W charging, making it ideal for users constantly on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme 8 Pro handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won't match flagship performance, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Oppo A92’s Snapdragon 665.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro compared to the Oppo A92’s 18W charging in real-world use?
The 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro is dramatically faster. You can expect to go from 0% to 50% in just 17 minutes, and a full charge in under an hour. The Oppo A92’s 18W charging will take considerably longer, potentially exceeding two hours for a full charge.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Snapdragon 665 and 720G noticeable for everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. While both phones can handle basic tasks, the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro offers snappier app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience. This is particularly evident when switching between apps or browsing the web.
