The Oppo A92 and OnePlus Nord CE 5G represent distinct approaches to the budget 5G smartphone market. The A92, leveraging the Snapdragon 665, aims for affordability, while the Nord CE 5G, with its Snapdragon 750G, prioritizes a step up in performance and 5G connectivity. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset offers a significant performance boost over the A92’s Snapdragon 665, coupled with faster 30W charging. While both phones share identical battery endurance ratings, the Nord CE 5G’s quicker charging mitigates any potential range anxiety.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Southeast Asia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 04. Released 2020, May 09 | 2021, June 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159.2 x 73.5 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens
2 MP B/W, f/2.4 | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White, Aurora Purple | Blue Void, Charkoal Ink, Silver Ray |
| Models | CPH2059 | EB2101, EB2103 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.9 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318672 (v8) | 391770 (v9)
GeekBench: 1812 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A92
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery endurance
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Significantly slower processor
- Slower charging speed
- Lacks 5G connectivity
OnePlus Nord CE 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 750G processor
- 5G connectivity
- 30W fast charging
- Slightly higher price
- Similar battery endurance to A92
- May require more frequent charging due to increased usage
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 607 nits, compared to the Oppo A92’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. Both displays feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting standard IPS LCD technology. While neither phone specifies advanced features like LTPO, the Nord CE 5G’s superior brightness provides a more pleasant viewing experience in various lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Oppo A92. The OnePlus Nord CE 5G likely benefits from the more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 750G, enabling better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Without specific sensor details for the A92, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but the 750G’s processing power gives the Nord CE 5G an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A92’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm) utilizes a Kryo 260 CPU configuration, while the OnePlus Nord CE 5G’s Snapdragon 750G (8nm) employs the more modern Kryo 570 architecture. The 8nm process node of the 750G is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The 750G’s CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz + 6x1.8 GHz) also offers a performance advantage over the A92’s (4x2.0 GHz + 4x1.8 GHz), particularly in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The 750G also includes an integrated 5G modem, a feature absent in the A92.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones achieve an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the A92’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the OnePlus Nord CE 5G significantly outperforms the A92 in charging speed, offering 30W wired charging capable of reaching 70% charge in just 30 minutes, compared to the A92’s slower 18W charging. This faster charging capability is a crucial advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A92 if you prioritize extreme affordability and basic smartphone functionality, and 5G isn't a necessity. It's suitable for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 5G if you want a smoother, more responsive experience, faster 5G connectivity, and quicker charging – ideal for gamers, content creators, and those who demand more from their smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 750G in the Nord CE 5G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium to high settings. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly smoother gaming experience compared to the Snapdragon 665 in the Oppo A92, thanks to its more powerful GPU and efficient architecture.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Nord CE 5G compared to the 18W charging on the A92 in real-world use?
The Nord CE 5G can reach 70% charge in approximately 30 minutes, while the A92 will take considerably longer to achieve a similar charge level. This translates to a much quicker top-up during short breaks, making the Nord CE 5G more convenient for users who are frequently on the go.
❓ Does the Nord CE 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G supports carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for significantly faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a key advantage over older 5G modems.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance between the Snapdragon 665 and 750G noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both phones can handle basic tasks, the Snapdragon 750G provides a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience. Apps launch faster, multitasking is more fluid, and scrolling is less likely to stutter, making everyday use more enjoyable.
